.
The best thread ever
Sort:
Best thread ever 
And just to continue the thread and go by your rules I choose to insult you Tiago "You dumbass" 
. Thus continuing the thread.
Also i thought why not add a stupid question someone may like to answer...
Why can't men wear handbags, they are so much more useful than wallets???
Any information back on the subject would be much appreciated.
lol I agree
Puc_7 wrote:
And just to continue the thread and go by your rules I choose to insult you Tiago "You dumbass" . Thus continuing the thread.
Also i thought why not add a stupid question someone may like to answer...
Why can't men wear handbags, they are so much more useful than wallets???
Any information back on the subject would be much appreciated.
YOU sir, are THE most retarded human being I've ever had the displeasure of finding in my entire life (Edit: I Love you)
On the topic of your question, that is the 65º reason why women are better than men and the 78º reason why men are better than women
I wear what you might call a handbag.
Other good thread promoters:
-- Accuse someone of cheating
-- Take an unwavering stance on any of the following:
>> Never resign/people don't resign enough
>> Opening X is unplayable/the best
>> Player Y was better than PlayerZ
++ Choose two players from different eras (so the argument can't be settled)
++ Bobby Fischer is a good choice for Player Z
>> Computers will/will not solve chess in the next (10|20|50) years.
If you're really stuck, jump in and correct someone's grammar. Combine with 2 for added effect.
Observe...
"You're thread"!! "You're post"!! You're a dumbass more like!!11
I have a handbag that keeps me warm when it's cold. I call it a coat. 
2 - Insult someone - That way, you're bound to get an answer!
3 - Insult that someone again
Now that's guaranteed to work :D..
Loomis wrote:
Other good thread promoters:
-- Accuse someone of cheating
-- Take an unwavering stance on any of the following:
>> Never resign/people don't resign enough
>> Opening X is unplayable/the best
>> Player Y was better than PlayerZ
++ Choose two players from different eras (so the argument can't be settled)
++ Bobby Fischer is a good choice for Player Z
>> Computers will/will not solve chess in the next (10|20|50) years.
Of course Rybka is better than Fisher!!! I mean, in the next 2 years it will become invincible!! C´mon!!! Even if Fisher played 1. f3 2. g4 he wouldn't have a chance! (Though it's the best opening known to man)
In fact, the only players that have ever beaten Rybka were all cheating.
Oh, and, on another subject, I never resing, and you, Loomis, are a disgrace to mankind
one sure thing, when i say something, or post something, i dont get the satisfaction of it depending on how many people read it or reply on it. In fact, I dont need approbation of other people to decide if im right or not, lol. I have the ability to think by myself. I am far from waiting to get "validation in life" (lol, funny) from other people. Anyway, considering that most of the people are stupid, dont have much education and are unable to think by themselves, I am really far from waiting for others to decide if im ok with them or not, lol. Plus, when I see threads like this, it just makes me feel good to be me :)
laporte wrote: one sure thing, when i say something, or post something, i dont get the satisfaction of it depending on how many people read it or reply on it. In fact, I dont need approbation of other people to decide if im right or not, lol. I have the ability to think by myself. I am far from waiting to get "validation in life" (lol, funny) from other people. Anyway, considering that most of the people are stupid, dont have much education and are unable to think by themselves, I am really far from waiting for others to decide if im ok with them or not, lol. Plus, when I see threads like this, it just makes me feel good to be me :)
You think by yourself?? You should be ashamed!!! Have you not understood that we should all give in into group mentality?? I love the Big Brother (if you're to dumb to understand, that's a reference to George Orwell's 1984 - Either read it, or stop calling other people uneducated)
This is a stupid thread :-) Hey I just followed the rules, now it's really good!
TiagoDevesa wrote: You think by yourself?? You should be ashamed!!! Have you not understood that we should all give in into group mentality?? I love the Big Brother (if you're to dumb to understand, that's a reference to George Orwell's 1984 - Either read it, or stop calling other people uneducated)"
Hhahaha. You took it personnaly huh. Hit a nerve huh :) 2 possibilities. You damn know im right, and it pissed you off that people can find you uneducated, or you dont get the point, proving you are stupid. Both ways, feels even better to be me :)
big brother. WTF :))))))
lol
HWo could you guys say this. You act like you know how to post a thread. I bett all of you guys are just LAZY LUMPS OF FLESH. YOU SPEND ALL YOUR DAYS WATCHING NARUTO AND YOU WISH YOU HAD A LIFE!
preety good lol
I dont answer back to this, as i am afraid it will never end. Some people just dont deserve to understand things. Thats nature ;) ciao :)
i was just wondering, i just made a fourum thread, and it is not on the front page. why is that?
laporte wrote: TiagoDevesa wrote: You think by yourself?? You should be ashamed!!! Have you not understood that we should all give in into group mentality?? I love the Big Brother (if you're to dumb to understand, that's a reference to George Orwell's 1984 - Either read it, or stop calling other people uneducated)"
Hhahaha. You took it personnaly huh. Hit a nerve huh :) 2 possibilities. You damn know im right, and it pissed you off that people can find you uneducated, or you dont get the point, proving you are stupid. Both ways, feels even better to be me :)
big brother. WTF :))))))
Oh how wrong you are my dear dear friend... I didn't take it personally ... I just enjoy insulting :)
And creating a choice with only two options when more of them exist is kind of childish
Moving on, and don't feel obligated to answer the previous part of the post, why do you say WTF to the reference of Big Brother?
Please Sign Up to comment.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
What is that you say Johnny? You are tired of making forum threads that get only two or three comments? You are so desperate that the only validation you can get in your life comes from a website about chess?
Well, don't worry! I'll teach you how to make sure your forum thread is an absolute success and how to make it grow larger every day!
Well, lets start with the obvious, the Title. Well, use something appelative, like "The best" whatever.
Now, its time to chose a topic. Here are some suggestions:
--- Something polemical like "Chess is not a sport" is always bound to get attention... Why don't you try something like "One hundred reasons why men are better than women at chess" ou the opposite.
---- Or, you can always create a thread asking a ridiculous question that everyone will want to answer like "What do you prefer, black or white?" or "What is your favourite piece" or "What do you guys think is the best 54# move for white?"
---- Or, if you're a lazy bastard, you can always capitalize on an existing popular topic by asking exactly the same question or making the opposite statement... like "What is your favourite piece colour? Black or white?" or "Chess IS a sport"
Now that you've started you're thread, it's time to publish it. Wait for a time of the day when most Americans are online, even if that means having to stay awake 'till 4 in the morning because you live in a different time zone.
Congratulations! Your topic was posted!
Now comes the hardest part: After the first ten or so comments, interest will kind of fade. So, this is what you do:
1 - Post in your own forum so it will go back to the "recent posts" section
2 - Insult someone - That way, you're bound to get an answer!
3 - Insult that someone again
4 - Repeat steps 2 and 3 for two more users or so... This way, the generated confusion will be enough to turn those users against each other besides against you
5 - Repeat step 1
6 - If you're out of ideas to step 1 and 5, just quote someone's post and say "lol" or, "I agree" or "You're a dumbass" (This way you're including step 2 in step 1!!!)
7 - Add another stupid question to you're post
8 - Enjoy the mess
Now, go Johnny, go and be happy!!