InsertInterestingNameHere wrote:
punny is the unfunniest pun ever omg don’t even
*pulls out gun* My puns are the best, don't you agree?
The Biggest Secret to Gaining Rating
Sort:
N O
May 18, 2022
0
#64
@InsertInterestingNameHere mysterious closed their account the next day.
May 18, 2022
0
#66
It should change the way the Nimxo is played. Prepare to see this move at the Candidates!
Cheat
May 18, 2022
0
#69
deathspiral1 wrote:
Cheat
That will skyrocket your rating. Unfortunately, this approach often results in a ban. Chess.com's system is flawed though. @im_not_a_cheter was banned, despite his username clearly stating that he was not a cheater, while Stockfish, a known engine user, is still around after years!
alphaous wrote:
deathspiral1 wrote:
Cheat
That will skyrocket your rating. Unfortunately, this approach often results in a ban. Chess.com's system is flawed though. @im_not_a_cheter was banned, despite his username clearly stating that he was not a cheater, while Stockfish, a known engine user, is still around after years!
He wasn’t a cheater though... he just beat one 2000 and transferred the points to a bunch of accounts, then farmed the one with the highest rating, and BAM 5000 rating. That’s why he isn’t banned for fair play, because he was playing fair, but instead for abuse.
May 19, 2022
0
#71
TheSwissPhoenix wrote:
alphaous wrote:
deathspiral1 wrote:
Cheat
That will skyrocket your rating. Unfortunately, this approach often results in a ban. Chess.com's system is flawed though. @im_not_a_cheter was banned, despite his username clearly stating that he was not a cheater, while Stockfish, a known engine user, is still around after years!
He wasn’t a cheater though... he just beat one 2000 and transferred the points to a bunch of accounts, then farmed the one with the highest rating, and BAM 5000 rating. That’s why he isn’t banned for fair play, because he was playing fair, but instead for abuse.
Really? Isn't that still a fair play violation?
alphaous wrote:
TheSwissPhoenix wrote:
alphaous wrote:
deathspiral1 wrote:
Cheat
That will skyrocket your rating. Unfortunately, this approach often results in a ban. Chess.com's system is flawed though. @im_not_a_cheter was banned, despite his username clearly stating that he was not a cheater, while Stockfish, a known engine user, is still around after years!
He wasn’t a cheater though... he just beat one 2000 and transferred the points to a bunch of accounts, then farmed the one with the highest rating, and BAM 5000 rating. That’s why he isn’t banned for fair play, because he was playing fair, but instead for abuse.
Really? Isn't that still a fair play violation?
Idk what “fair play” means I’m just saying he isn’t cheating
May 19, 2022
0
#73
TheSwissPhoenix wrote:
alphaous wrote:
TheSwissPhoenix wrote:
alphaous wrote:
deathspiral1 wrote:
Cheat
That will skyrocket your rating. Unfortunately, this approach often results in a ban. Chess.com's system is flawed though. @im_not_a_cheter was banned, despite his username clearly stating that he was not a cheater, while Stockfish, a known engine user, is still around after years!
He wasn’t a cheater though... he just beat one 2000 and transferred the points to a bunch of accounts, then farmed the one with the highest rating, and BAM 5000 rating. That’s why he isn’t banned for fair play, because he was playing fair, but instead for abuse.
Really? Isn't that still a fair play violation?
Idk what “fair play” means I’m just saying he isn’t cheating
Any manipulation of ratings is a fair play violation.
alphaous wrote:
TheSwissPhoenix wrote:
alphaous wrote:
TheSwissPhoenix wrote:
alphaous wrote:
deathspiral1 wrote:
Cheat
That will skyrocket your rating. Unfortunately, this approach often results in a ban. Chess.com's system is flawed though. @im_not_a_cheter was banned, despite his username clearly stating that he was not a cheater, while Stockfish, a known engine user, is still around after years!
He wasn’t a cheater though... he just beat one 2000 and transferred the points to a bunch of accounts, then farmed the one with the highest rating, and BAM 5000 rating. That’s why he isn’t banned for fair play, because he was playing fair, but instead for abuse.
Really? Isn't that still a fair play violation?
Idk what “fair play” means I’m just saying he isn’t cheating
Any manipulation of ratings is a fair play violation.
Oh then idk
alphaous wrote:
TheSwissPhoenix wrote:
alphaous wrote:
TheSwissPhoenix wrote:
alphaous wrote:
deathspiral1 wrote:
Cheat
That will skyrocket your rating. Unfortunately, this approach often results in a ban. Chess.com's system is flawed though. @im_not_a_cheter was banned, despite his username clearly stating that he was not a cheater, while Stockfish, a known engine user, is still around after years!
He wasn’t a cheater though... he just beat one 2000 and transferred the points to a bunch of accounts, then farmed the one with the highest rating, and BAM 5000 rating. That’s why he isn’t banned for fair play, because he was playing fair, but instead for abuse.
Really? Isn't that still a fair play violation?
Idk what “fair play” means I’m just saying he isn’t cheating
Any manipulation of ratings is a fair play violation.
Chess.com manipulated my rating after I lost a rapid game
May 19, 2022
0
#76
MegaPro-123 wrote:
alphaous wrote:
TheSwissPhoenix wrote:
alphaous wrote:
TheSwissPhoenix wrote:
alphaous wrote:
deathspiral1 wrote:
Cheat
That will skyrocket your rating. Unfortunately, this approach often results in a ban. Chess.com's system is flawed though. @im_not_a_cheter was banned, despite his username clearly stating that he was not a cheater, while Stockfish, a known engine user, is still around after years!
He wasn’t a cheater though... he just beat one 2000 and transferred the points to a bunch of accounts, then farmed the one with the highest rating, and BAM 5000 rating. That’s why he isn’t banned for fair play, because he was playing fair, but instead for abuse.
Really? Isn't that still a fair play violation?
Idk what “fair play” means I’m just saying he isn’t cheating
Any manipulation of ratings is a fair play violation.
Chess.com manipulated my rating after I lost a rapid game
Let me guess: You lost around 8 points? @ChessCom has been doing that for years, and I'm not having it. Chess.com can't steal points from me just because I'm trash!
May 19, 2022
0
#77
alphaous wrote:
Let me guess: You lost around 8 points? @ChessCom has been doing that for years, and I'm not having it. Chess.com can't steal points from me just because I'm trash!
Chess.com also has this illegal move!!!111!!1111! 
:
May 19, 2022
0
#78
alphaous wrote:
Any manipulation of ratings is a fair play violation.
This is correct.
... although there are ways to work within the system. I gained 152 points in two games, for example, after taking a two-year break from playing rated chess. One could protest that this is exploiting the Glicko-2 RD rating feature. On the other hand, one could argue that this is exactly how that feature is INTENDED to work.
May 19, 2022
0
#79
BishopTakesH7 wrote:
alphaous wrote:
Let me guess: You lost around 8 points? @ChessCom has been doing that for years, and I'm not having it. Chess.com can't steal points from me just because I'm trash!
Chess.com also has this illegal move!!!111!!1111! :
Yes, and although many concerned patrons have complained, Chess.com has merely laughed about the problem! Although this also exists on Lichess, so maybe all chess websites are conspiring against us.
punny is the unfunniest pun ever omg don’t even