The chess.com analysis engine is a jerk

Sort:
Avatar of atomichicken
jazzTUNE wrote:
atomichicken wrote:

OK, enough talk. I can't be bothered to answer every stupid comment that is made anymore.

Here's a link for everyone interested to follow, which apparantly is a few of you:

rich vs atomichicken


Now it's just a matter of who will use the strongest computer program to cheat with. Good luck with that atomichicken. Rich appears honest, but you certainly do not.


Listen matey, if you have any evidence at all of me cheating then report me to an administrator and get me banned, if not then be quiet. "Rich appears honest", well he's not, he makes a habit of lying. Please point me to one thing I have done on this site so far which has been dishonest!

Avatar of Narz
Rael wrote:
Maradonna wrote:

I can't wait to see the outcome of this game, there is a lot on it now. Actually, it'll probably continue afterwards, with accusations about extra help and the likes. Pity it's not over the board :)


 I agree - it's neat to have the egos on the line like a prize fight boxing match or something. I also agree that it would've been fun to see as an on the board match, because now, with such claims riding on it's outcome, I'm sure the two combatants are hunkering down in their analysis.

I'm way to patzerish too know who is doing better or what have you (and we're not allowed to discuss that, of course), but I'm most definitely going to be a spectator.


I'll take 'em both on.  I must punish them for what's become of my thread. Laughing

Avatar of coyotte508

Narz you intended to make it a not-so-serious thread...

Lol this is a success, and relaxing to read.

 

Btw how on earth could a 1800 could have made the knight-bishop exchange?

Avatar of AMagnusWoody
atomichicken wrote

Listen matey, if you have any evidence at all of me cheating then report me to an administrator and get me banned, if not then be quiet. "Rich appears honest", well he's not, he makes a habit of lying. Please point me to one thing I have done on this site so far which has been dishonest!


Oh, that's a easy one:

atomichicken online chess Rating

Current: 1885
   
Avatar of atomichicken
jazzTUNE wrote:
atomichicken wrote

Listen matey, if you have any evidence at all of me cheating then report me to an administrator and get me banned, if not then be quiet. "Rich appears honest", well he's not, he makes a habit of lying. Please point me to one thing I have done on this site so far which has been dishonest!


Oh, that's a easy one:

atomichicken online chess Rating

Current: 1885    

Wow, great evidence. So, off you go then. Report me to an administrator and get me banned. Chess.com is known for it's effective cheater detection policies. If it really is so "easy" for you to see that I've been cheating, then I expect to have my account closed by the time I wake up. Good night all!

Avatar of Narz
coyotte508 wrote:

Narz you intended to make it a not-so-serious thread...

Lol this is a success, and relaxing to read.


Nonsense.  This was supposed to be quite serious.  I'll let my feline friend speak for me on that regard.

Seriously though, Rich & chicken, take me on kiddos. Laughing

I sent you both invties : http://www.chess.com/tournament/jerk-thread-tourney

Avatar of Thunersee

This thread is ripe for being deleted by the moderators but I hope they don't because it's way too funny!

For heaven's sake, if you think you're better than somebody you don't have to argue about it - JUST BEAT THEM!

But you are entertaining the rest of us by arguing about it!  Wink

Avatar of Mainline_Novelty
Narz wrote:
coyotte508 wrote:

Narz you intended to make it a not-so-serious thread...

Lol this is a success, and relaxing to read.


Nonsense.  This was supposed to be quite serious.  I'll let my feline friend speak for me on that regard.

 

Seriously though, Rich & chicken, take me on kiddos.

I sent you both invties : http://www.chess.com/tournament/jerk-thread-tourney


lol

Avatar of atomichicken
Narz wrote:
coyotte508 wrote:

Narz you intended to make it a not-so-serious thread...

Lol this is a success, and relaxing to read.


Nonsense.  This was supposed to be quite serious.  I'll let my feline friend speak for me on that regard.

 

Seriously though, Rich & chicken, take me on kiddos.

I sent you both invties : http://www.chess.com/tournament/jerk-thread-tourney


Oh, I saw the invite before I saw this message and declined. But send it to me again and I'll accept. And yes, I will admit that is a funny pic Smile. But you realise if you want rich to join, calling it the "jerk thread tourney" is not the way to do it, his ego being what it is lol. I agree this thread has become really stupid, but that's not my fault. It just seems that the village idiots keep coming out of the shadows to try and prove some kind of point with me.

Avatar of atomichicken
bvangunten wrote:

This thread is ripe for being deleted by the moderators but I hope they don't because it's way too funny!

For heaven's sake, if you think you're better than somebody you don't have to argue about it - JUST BEAT THEM!

But you are entertaining the rest of us by arguing about it! 


As I said, I'm all up for laying the argument to rest. I just wish jazztune was.

Avatar of atomichicken
coyotte508 wrote:

Narz you intended to make it a not-so-serious thread...

Lol this is a success, and relaxing to read.

 

Btw how on earth could a 1800 could have made the knight-bishop exchange?


Tell me about it. I'm not sure I know that, it's one of my worst correspondance errors in about a year. btw I eat 1800 players for breakfast, I am a 2000+ player. Just give me more than 8 games to prove it.

Avatar of atomichicken
atomichicken wrote:
jazzTUNE wrote:
atomichicken wrote

Listen matey, if you have any evidence at all of me cheating then report me to an administrator and get me banned, if not then be quiet. "Rich appears honest", well he's not, he makes a habit of lying. Please point me to one thing I have done on this site so far which has been dishonest!


Oh, that's a easy one:

atomichicken online chess Rating

Current: 1885    

Wow, great evidence. So, off you go then. Report me to an administrator and get me banned. Chess.com is known for it's effective cheater detection policies. If it really is so "easy" for you to see that I've been cheating, then I expect to have my account closed by the time I wake up. Good night all!


Oh, well what do you know. Surprise, surprise, I awake to find my account still open! Next time you are going to openly accuse someone of cheating in a public forum, it would be a good idea if you actually have any evidence at all to prove it.

Avatar of u0-0000
atomichicken wrote:
atomichicken wrote:
jazzTUNE wrote:
atomichicken wrote

Listen matey, if you have any evidence at all of me cheating then report me to an administrator and get me banned, if not then be quiet. "Rich appears honest", well he's not, he makes a habit of lying. Please point me to one thing I have done on this site so far which has been dishonest!


Oh, that's a easy one:

atomichicken online chess Rating

Current: 1885    

Wow, great evidence. So, off you go then. Report me to an administrator and get me banned. Chess.com is known for it's effective cheater detection policies. If it really is so "easy" for you to see that I've been cheating, then I expect to have my account closed by the time I wake up. Good night all!


Oh, well what do you know. Surprise, surprise, I awake to find my account still open! Next time you are going to openly accuse someone of cheating in a public forum, it would be a good idea if you actually have any evidence at all to prove it.


Calm down dude!

Early morning myocardial infarctions is a very real occurrence!

Avatar of atomichicken
0-0 wrote:
atomichicken wrote:
atomichicken wrote:
jazzTUNE wrote:
atomichicken wrote

Listen matey, if you have any evidence at all of me cheating then report me to an administrator and get me banned, if not then be quiet. "Rich appears honest", well he's not, he makes a habit of lying. Please point me to one thing I have done on this site so far which has been dishonest!


Oh, that's a easy one:

atomichicken online chess Rating

Current: 1885    

Wow, great evidence. So, off you go then. Report me to an administrator and get me banned. Chess.com is known for it's effective cheater detection policies. If it really is so "easy" for you to see that I've been cheating, then I expect to have my account closed by the time I wake up. Good night all!


Oh, well what do you know. Surprise, surprise, I awake to find my account still open! Next time you are going to openly accuse someone of cheating in a public forum, it would be a good idea if you actually have any evidence at all to prove it.


Calm down dude!

Early morning myocardial infarctions is a very real occurrence!


erm... I have no idea what "myocardial infarctions" means. Undecided

Avatar of u0-0000
atomichicken wrote:
0-0 wrote:
atomichicken wrote:
atomichicken wrote:
jazzTUNE wrote:
atomichicken wrote

Listen matey, if you have any evidence at all of me cheating then report me to an administrator and get me banned, if not then be quiet. "Rich appears honest", well he's not, he makes a habit of lying. Please point me to one thing I have done on this site so far which has been dishonest!


Oh, that's a easy one:

atomichicken online chess Rating

Current: 1885    

Wow, great evidence. So, off you go then. Report me to an administrator and get me banned. Chess.com is known for it's effective cheater detection policies. If it really is so "easy" for you to see that I've been cheating, then I expect to have my account closed by the time I wake up. Good night all!


Oh, well what do you know. Surprise, surprise, I awake to find my account still open! Next time you are going to openly accuse someone of cheating in a public forum, it would be a good idea if you actually have any evidence at all to prove it.


Calm down dude!

Early morning myocardial infarctions is a very real occurrence!


erm... I have no idea what "myocardial infarctions" means.


heart attacks

Avatar of u0-0000

its a shame! such a high chess rating and such poor general knowledge...

Avatar of atomichicken
0-0 wrote:
atomichicken wrote:
0-0 wrote:
atomichicken wrote:
atomichicken wrote:
jazzTUNE wrote:
atomichicken wrote

Listen matey, if you have any evidence at all of me cheating then report me to an administrator and get me banned, if not then be quiet. "Rich appears honest", well he's not, he makes a habit of lying. Please point me to one thing I have done on this site so far which has been dishonest!


Oh, that's a easy one:

atomichicken online chess Rating

Current: 1885    

Wow, great evidence. So, off you go then. Report me to an administrator and get me banned. Chess.com is known for it's effective cheater detection policies. If it really is so "easy" for you to see that I've been cheating, then I expect to have my account closed by the time I wake up. Good night all!


Oh, well what do you know. Surprise, surprise, I awake to find my account still open! Next time you are going to openly accuse someone of cheating in a public forum, it would be a good idea if you actually have any evidence at all to prove it.


Calm down dude!

Early morning myocardial infarctions is a very real occurrence!


erm... I have no idea what "myocardial infarctions" means.


heart attacks


OK, very funny.

Avatar of atomichicken
0-0 wrote:

its a shame! such a high chess rating and such poor general knowledge...


Woe is me. Cry

Avatar of u0-0000
atomichicken wrote:
0-0 wrote:

its a shame! such a high chess rating and such poor general knowledge...


Woe is me.


ah its ok just having a bit of fun with you.

Avatar of atomichicken
0-0 wrote:
atomichicken wrote:
0-0 wrote:

its a shame! such a high chess rating and such poor general knowledge...


Woe is me.


ah its ok just having a bit of fun with you.


lol Yeah, I know.