YOU GET THE ENEMY PAWN TO GO ONE DOWN AND THEN YOU MOVE 2 UP AND THEN THEY KILL YOU????? BRUH
I usually get mad when someone plays En Passant against me, but when I play En Passant against someone, yes, it's a great rule if I'm winning if that position. En Passant is a bit confusing though but the sole purpose of En Passant is so that it's not inconvenient and the game won't be in a drawish position with Pawn v. Pawn. I don't have a side with En Passant because it is already a rule and you could do nothing about it unless they actually change the rules.
YOU GET THE ENEMY PAWN TO GO ONE DOWN AND THEN YOU MOVE 2 UP AND THEN THEY KILL YOU????? BRUH
I usually get mad when someone plays En Passant against me, but when I play En Passant against someone, yes, it's a great rule if I'm winning if that position. En Passant is a bit confusing though but the sole purpose of En Passant is so that it's not inconvenient and the game won't be in a drawish position with a Pawn v. Pawn position. I don't have a side with En Passant because it is already a rule and you could do nothing about it unless they actually change the rules.