The h2 h4 opening for whites or h6 h4 for black

Wrong moves are those which cause loss. Right moves are those which cause winning. If certain moves allow positional advantage, which helps winning, disregard if opponent blunders or not, they are right ones. 

Even  knowledge of theory tells you that those right moves are wrong ones, the scoreboard is only thing that matters at the end.

Here is another interesting 30 min. game ;as I wrote I will be playing long games from now on, to avoid argument that Gabrichidze Opening (formerly known as kadas) only works for the blitz.

at the first sight it seems that black simply blundered terribly, but if one takes time checking position move by move, it is easy to see that before 21. Nge2 f5 game want on without any mistakes or blunders for black(stupid chess.com analysis is marking some of my moves as mistake, but thee all part of the strategy dictated by the actual opening ).

however after 21. black simply run out of moves. Composition was so bad for black that every move would cause either loss of material o loss of position.

If any of you can suggest way out of the game for black after move 21, wold be interesting to listen.

Good thing about flank pawn opening is that it dictates certain follow up of the game with lots of advantages.

I missed a mate in the end, but won disregard.

Well that depends on how serious you are. If you want to improve then you should not just think about what works now, but what will make you a better chess player in the future.

The first problem with this opening is that as you get better you are going to meet more experience players and the shock value is going to decrease in which case the win percentage is going down. You are also going to meet players who can effectively exploit the weaknesses of your opening. Of course you could change your opening repertoire by the time you get to that level, but then you are going to play positions in which you have a lot less experience with.

The second problem with playing dubious opening is that the times you win because of the opening is going to be the times where your opponent plays poorly. In this case you will learn less from the game then if you played against someone who played their best.

"Well that depends on how serious you are. If you want to improve then you should not just think about what works now, but what will make you a better chess player in the future." 

Certainly.  trying to be creative, and exploring new opportunities, is surely better way then just trying to learn existing routine. in fact without trying to invent some new, own way, one will be always an average player.

Another troll

"The first problem with this opening is that as you get better you are going to meet more experience players and the shock value is going to decrease in which case the win percentage is going down. You are also going to meet players who can effectively exploit the weaknesses of your opening. Of course you could change your opening repertoire by the time you get to that level, but then you are going to play positions in which you have a lot less experience with."

And this is a part where study helps.

"The second problem with playing dubious opening is that the times you win because of the opening is going to be the times where your opponent plays poorly"

First of all all chess games is juts about who makes more mistakes, and who makes final mistakes. Hypothetical game between to ideal brains who both play perfect chess will be always draw.

One of the challenges of the players strategy is to exploit the opponents weakness, and use the ways to make opponent play weaker. So this is not an argument.

Trying to develop new opening(or other aspect of the game), does not mean refusal to study actual routine and existing openings or closing. So argument of studying instead of investing isn't relevant here.

Will you be posting all your games (including losses) to make that argument, or just the 1 out of X win to create the disingenuous picture that the opening cannot be beat?

Your opening is making weaknesses in your own camp, it does not create any threats against your opponent as far as i know and it is not difficult to play against. If you are going to study that opening then you are going to spend a lot of time trying to make a bad opening work, when you can study other things.

When it comes to your second post: If you want to improve, you must improve your own chess abilities. The best thing you can hope for with 1.h4 is that your opponent use more time in the opening. As i stated in the last post, this is not going to work against experienced players and the only thing you achieve is more weaknesses in your position.

No offense or anything but at some point I was trying to win with all first moves and after taking about 15 games on h4 (I don't even remember if I suceeded) and loosing a lot of rating points, I finally gave up.

Another game from today(30 min. not blitz). h2 h4 opening again; once again blacks were playing very carefully, almost no risks, leave alone blinders, but lost,

And remember-key isn't just starting with hé h4. Key is trying to have strong pawn at g5 blocking opponents knights and, potentially, castling. Should be followed by similar attack at another flank.

"Sure you studied chess , it is so obvious from the way you play. And you studied so much and you are so good that you are already ready to violate all rules and create new ones. The wonderful naivety of ignorance!"

There is no no rule about the opening.

h2 h4 is considered to be weak opening, but it is simply matter of opinion. In a same way like in pre WW2 chess queens gambit was considered ONLY acceptable opening for educated player. It was just a matter of opinion, but everyone thought it is a "rrule", until younger players of the time just rejected the doge and brought whole banch of insetting new openings: Karo Cannes, Sicilian, french , Indian etc etc.

i will be posting interesting games, including interesting loses. I can try to find a few. However 90% of games I lose are either result of terrible blinder, or myself abandoning the game for whatever reason(visitors, computer glitch, urgent business etc). Games lost prepositionally will be posted.

For those who challenge me-I dont play one day games , sorry. I can play 30 min, or 10 min blitz with anyone(preferably long game)

" If a  kindergarden kid tried to correct quantum physics , everybody would laugh with him but he would at least have the excuse of age.You don't have even that.Still , you make us laugh a lot so keep up what you are doing. "

Lets play (30 min.)

we will see who'll laugh.

"I am not trying to stop you , quite the contrary, I hope you are short minded enough to believe that you are right and everybody else is wrong."

Chess game is not a popularity contest. It is irrelevant how many people like what i say or not. Scoreboard is only thing what matters at the end. 

Guys if you want to challenge me, I accept only 30 min(or 45 min) game. People here say that my opening is good only for blitz, so I stopped blitz, and I don't play 3 or 5 in games.

I saw you online and challenged you for 30 min. game. Why have you run away?

I dont play 5 min. Let me try 30

No, lets play 30. It was rightfully said hee that blitz is too short to judge blitz game for chess quality

I was about to post the game myself. I lost because I blundered, not because I had weaker position. there were better moves at 16... Qa1+ 17. Rb1) and (18... Qc1+  hich would allow keep the advantage. Scoreboard is only thing what matters, but if you dont mind I'd gladly play few more games with you(not today)