The Minimum Rating Required to be A Grandmaster is 2500!

Sort:
One_Zeroith
DesperateKingWalk wrote:
Kyobir wrote:

you can get wgm title without 2500 rating

And the GM title, with a 2300 rating

With a GM Title...AND...

One_Zeroith
One_Zeroith wrote:

Nothing there that states, without winning sort on world tournaments.

If you have 2300 without this, it won't count. 2500 automatically gets you there.

You did not elaborate on your 2nd post here.

Fixed it.

One_Zeroith

I win.

Bye

RaNdOmAcCoUnT6942088888

wait, why is this relevant at all to anyone? thanks i guess for posting the wiki page.This is like that one nerd that announces all the continents and acts all proud but there is a world map right on the wall.

One_Zeroith

The Minimum Rating Required to be A Grandmaster is 2500!...And 2300 IF you win in specified tournaments [...] ONLY.

One_Zeroith

Now I'm done.

Bye bye.

Stuckfish

Interesting... Posting easily googleable (and incomplete) information as if they're doing everyone a favour, can't cope with being corrected, pointing out/inventing grammatical issues in replies, comments like "I win"... The options are limited.

  1. A autistic teenager with very low self esteem
  2. A middle aged narcissist who discovered they aren't any good at chess and is groping for a different way to feel intellectually superior
  3. A run of the mill troll
Kyobir
Sporkled wrote:

Interesting... Posting easily googleable (and incomplete) information as if they're doing everyone a favour, can't cope with being corrected, pointing out/inventing grammatical issues in replies, comments like "I win"... The options are limited.

  1. A autistic teenager with very low self esteem
  2. A middle aged narcissist who discovered they aren't any good at chess and is groping for a different way to feel intellectually superior
  3. A run of the mill troll

hey!!! there are good trolls, you know

Stuckfish
Kyobir wrote:
Sporkled wrote:

Interesting... Posting easily googleable (and incomplete) information as if they're doing everyone a favour, can't cope with being corrected, pointing out/inventing grammatical issues in replies, comments like "I win"... The options are limited.

  1. A autistic teenager with very low self esteem
  2. A middle aged narcissist who discovered they aren't any good at chess and is groping for a different way to feel intellectually superior
  3. A run of the mill troll

hey!!! there are good trolls, you know

I surely didn't intend to besmirch the good name of troll

Kyobir
Sporkled wrote:
Kyobir wrote:
Sporkled wrote:

Interesting... Posting easily googleable (and incomplete) information as if they're doing everyone a favour, can't cope with being corrected, pointing out/inventing grammatical issues in replies, comments like "I win"... The options are limited.

  1. A autistic teenager with very low self esteem
  2. A middle aged narcissist who discovered they aren't any good at chess and is groping for a different way to feel intellectually superior
  3. A run of the mill troll

hey!!! there are good trolls, you know

I surely didn't intend to besmirch the good name of troll

Ok