The Secret of Chess

Sort:
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov
lfPatriotGames wrote:
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:
pretzel2 wrote:

hmm myabe sitting at home next to your pc is the secret of chess? 

I need an anechoic chamber.

All that noise, at tournaments, and even at home, just kills me.

People are now watching the Winter Olympics, the US does not have a budget, the North Korean's sister is in South Korea and all that makes a lot of unnecessary noise.

Still, home conditions definitely have some relative advantages:

- I can choose my best-suited settings in the GUI, large screen, favourite colours, etc.

- in OTB, the pieces and colouts are as they are, you can not choose them, and I simply hate that brown, as well as the contrast FIDE came up with

- SF does not talk, at least to my knowledge, neither makes any beeping sounds during games, this is a big advantage, as OTB many would like to talk, where you play or next table, some just to distract you

As simple as that, that is why home conditions are generally better suited for higher-quality chess, leaving aside North Korea and the US budget.

How do you know you need an anechoic chamber? Have you ever played chess in one? That's like a professional golfer saying he needs conditions with no wind, no rain, no temperatures above or below 72 degrees, and  no shadows. The conditions are the same for everyone. If you need an anechoic chamber, which no one else needs, it makes me think that your concentration (which is essential for chess) is very poor. I have often heard that people who are at the top of their profession have such good concentration that they get into a zone where almost no distractions matter. They dont hear or see anything other than what they are concentrating on. Professional athletes often say they never saw or heard the crowds yelling and screaming because they were so focused on what they were doing.     BTW, that joke about living in Copenhagen when really you dont. Hilarious. Love that Bulgarian humor.

This year, this February, this day, it is very noisy, everybody tries to distract you, it is the Korean dictator, the Russians and all the bad spirits in the world.

This is not a Bulgarian humour, it is international.

Why do Yogi then require complete silence, when they try to concentrate.

1500 does not need concentration, especially if living in Central America, I need, Fischer needed and everyone who plays good chess or does something creative of worth needs.

But don't you really know ALL the best works of art and literature/poetry have been written during the night, when it is usually quieter?

 

Lyudmil_Tsvetkov
cigoLogic wrote:

Again, I suggest that the OP plays on ICCF and become a World Champion. That would make me, and most others I think, take the OP seriously. 

I would give everything in this world so that you take me seriously.

Then, you might even consider buying my book.

I will travel, play OTB, play exhibitions, simuls, during the night and day, everything, just that you take me seriously.

Indeed, why should you read the book and try to understand it(this requires effort, you know), when you can simply come up with different demands.

Lyudmil_Tsvetkov
pfren wrote:
cigoLogic έγραψε:

Again, I suggest that the OP plays on ICCF and become a World Champion. That would make me, and most others I think, take the OP seriously. 

You must be joking. The best he can achieve there is having his butt kicked like a football.

Did you learn the Alekhine and the Grob, GM PfRen? happy.pnghappy.png

Lyudmil_Tsvetkov
hitthepin wrote:
Saying that you need silence to play is kind of a lame excuse. Magnus has to deal with noise, yet he’s FIDE 2700+ OTB.

I am not Magnus and Magnus is not me.

Btw., Magnus should still write his first chess book, when do you think he will do that and if at all?

I acknowledge though that Magnus started playing better with age.

Until 5 years ago, he played awful chess, but now his games are acceptable.

cigoLogic
pfren wrote:
cigoLogic έγραψε:

Again, I suggest that the OP plays on ICCF and become a World Champion. That would make me, and most others I think, take the OP seriously. 

You must be joking. The best he can achieve there is having his butt kicked like a football.

 

IM pfren, I do not think he will stand a chance playing at ICCF. I am only saying I would take him more seriously if he did. 

cigoLogic
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:
hitthepin wrote:
Saying that you need silence to play is kind of a lame excuse. Magnus has to deal with noise, yet he’s FIDE 2700+ OTB.

I am not Magnus and Magnus is not me.

Btw., Magnus should still write his first chess book, when do you think he will do that and if at all?

I acknowledge though that Magnus started playing better with age.

Until 5 years ago, he played awful chess, but now his games are acceptable.

 

So, according to the OP, Magnus played awful chess until five years ago (when he was 22). So, when he had a draw against Kasparov at the age of 13, now 14 years ago, his chess playing must - according to the "logic" of Lyudmil Tsvetkov have been "awfully awful". happy.png Jesus! 

nighteyes1234
cigoLogic wrote:

 

So, according to the OP, Magnus played awful chess until five years ago (when he was 22). So, when he had a draw against Kasparov at the age of 13, now 14 years ago, his chess playing must - according to the "logic" of Lyudmil Tsvetkov have been "awfully awful".  Jesus! 

 

Just another clue that the real story is that Lyudmil is Carlsen's secret second under an illiumanti decision. Carlsen plays a computer chess opening at Tata and no one is the wiser. Just dont tell his stone age fans that, they will go bananas!

chesster3145
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:
cigoLogic wrote:

Again, I suggest that the OP plays on ICCF and become a World Champion. That would make me, and most others I think, take the OP seriously. 

I would give everything in this world so that you take me seriously.

Then, you might even consider buying my book.

I will travel, play OTB, play exhibitions, simuls, during the night and day, everything, just that you take me seriously.

Indeed, why should you read the book and try to understand it(this requires effort, you know), when you can simply come up with different demands.

Because few people will even touch your book until you give them any reason to believe that it is any good and that you are a trustworthy author. Besides, nobody here has anything to learn from you.

chesster3145
DeirdreSkye wrote:
cigoLogic wrote:
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:
hitthepin wrote:
Saying that you need silence to play is kind of a lame excuse. Magnus has to deal with noise, yet he’s FIDE 2700+ OTB.

I am not Magnus and Magnus is not me.

Btw., Magnus should still write his first chess book, when do you think he will do that and if at all?

I acknowledge though that Magnus started playing better with age.

Until 5 years ago, he played awful chess, but now his games are acceptable.

 

So, according to the OP, Magnus played awful chess until five years ago (when he was 22). So, when he had a draw against Kasparov at the age of 13, now 14 years ago, his chess playing must - according to the "logic" of Lyudmil Tsvetkov have been "awfully awful".  Jesus! 

 

 

5 years ago Carlsen was World Champion but according to Tsvetkov he played awful chess.I guess Anand, Karjakin, Caruana , Nakamura , So and the rest top GMs were even more awful.

    It is quite obvious that Tsvetkov understands nothing about chess.

 

Especially when you see how he explains his "chess content"...

MAXZ7
Where is the secret
Tal1949

There is no secret. 2100 OTB. 3500 behind his computer.

Every titled player in the world can claim that.

JessieMillano2015

Tal1949 wrote:

There is no secret. 2100 OTB. 3500 behind his computer.

Every titled player in the world can claim that.

Finally, I found player who I share same sentiment with: there's no secret in Chess except cheating with engine. And I'm very sure Mr Tsvetkov's book isn't about it. Maybe he should change the title of his book - The Gospel Of Chess - An Entire Revision Of Super GM Lyudmil Tsvetkov's Critically Criticized Infamous Book: The Secret Of Chess.

Lyudmil_Tsvetkov
cigoLogic wrote:
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:
hitthepin wrote:
Saying that you need silence to play is kind of a lame excuse. Magnus has to deal with noise, yet he’s FIDE 2700+ OTB.

I am not Magnus and Magnus is not me.

Btw., Magnus should still write his first chess book, when do you think he will do that and if at all?

I acknowledge though that Magnus started playing better with age.

Until 5 years ago, he played awful chess, but now his games are acceptable.

 

So, according to the OP, Magnus played awful chess until five years ago (when he was 22). So, when he had a draw against Kasparov at the age of 13, now 14 years ago, his chess playing must - according to the "logic" of Lyudmil Tsvetkov have been "awfully awful".  Jesus! 

Kasparov played weak too. happy.png

Really, I have been studying Carlsen game collection closely, and the quality of his chess/used patterns significantly improves since around 5 yeasr ago.

I am also not able to find any worthwhile patterns previously, many of his games after that could be considered masterpieces, the logic of the game is intact.

Lyudmil_Tsvetkov
nighteyes1234 wrote:
cigoLogic wrote:

 

So, according to the OP, Magnus played awful chess until five years ago (when he was 22). So, when he had a draw against Kasparov at the age of 13, now 14 years ago, his chess playing must - according to the "logic" of Lyudmil Tsvetkov have been "awfully awful".  Jesus! 

 

Just another clue that the real story is that Lyudmil is Carlsen's secret second under an illiumanti decision. Carlsen plays a computer chess opening at Tata and no one is the wiser. Just dont tell his stone age fans that, they will go bananas!

Quiet! happy.png

Lyudmil_Tsvetkov
chesster3145 wrote:
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:
cigoLogic wrote:

Again, I suggest that the OP plays on ICCF and become a World Champion. That would make me, and most others I think, take the OP seriously. 

I would give everything in this world so that you take me seriously.

Then, you might even consider buying my book.

I will travel, play OTB, play exhibitions, simuls, during the night and day, everything, just that you take me seriously.

Indeed, why should you read the book and try to understand it(this requires effort, you know), when you can simply come up with different demands.

Because few people will even touch your book until you give them any reason to believe that it is any good and that you are a trustworthy author. Besides, nobody here has anything to learn from you.

I already taught you a lot.

Here some reviews for you to muse over: you saw the links, but you never read them:

https://en.chessbase.com/post/the-secret-of-chess

https://www.chess.com/blog/Swordfish55/review-the-secret-of-chess

http://www.secretofchess.com/files/17772/ckfinder/images/Review%20on%20The%20Secret%20of%20Chess.pdf

As you see, strong titled players think otherwise.

lfPatriotGames
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:
cigoLogic wrote:

Again, I suggest that the OP plays on ICCF and become a World Champion. That would make me, and most others I think, take the OP seriously. 

I would give everything in this world so that you take me seriously.

Then, you might even consider buying my book.

I will travel, play OTB, play exhibitions, simuls, during the night and day, everything, just that you take me seriously.

Indeed, why should you read the book and try to understand it(this requires effort, you know), when you can simply come up with different demands.

You think the world champion played awful chess 5 years ago and yet you wish people would take you seriously? Every day you become less serious and less credible. No wonder your book sales are doing poorly. As I said before, the best thing you can do for your book sales is to be silent. Say nothing. You cant play tournaments because of Korean dictators, Russians, and inconvenient airports. I am now pretty sure an anechoic chamber would make absolutely no difference in your performance. If your concentration is now so poor that bad spirits affect how you play then chess is probably not for you. Maybe you should take up poetry instead.

Lyudmil_Tsvetkov
DeirdreSkye wrote:
cigoLogic wrote:
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov wrote:
hitthepin wrote:
Saying that you need silence to play is kind of a lame excuse. Magnus has to deal with noise, yet he’s FIDE 2700+ OTB.

I am not Magnus and Magnus is not me.

Btw., Magnus should still write his first chess book, when do you think he will do that and if at all?

I acknowledge though that Magnus started playing better with age.

Until 5 years ago, he played awful chess, but now his games are acceptable.

 

So, according to the OP, Magnus played awful chess until five years ago (when he was 22). So, when he had a draw against Kasparov at the age of 13, now 14 years ago, his chess playing must - according to the "logic" of Lyudmil Tsvetkov have been "awfully awful".  Jesus! 

 

 

5 years ago Carlsen was World Champion but according to Tsvetkov he played awful chess.I guess Anand, Karjakin, Caruana , Nakamura , So and the rest top GMs were even more awful.

    It is quite obvious that Tsvetkov understands nothing about chess.

 

Lyudmil_Tsvetkov
Lyudmil_Tsvetkov

Now, compare the 2 games I have posted, the first one from long ago, the second one recent.

The first one is more or less random shuffling, Carlsen's king in the center, barely wins.

the second one is quite a different story: he knows his openings, no obvious tactical mistakes, a lot of patterns to recognise, almost a masterpiece.

Huge difference between the 2, is not there?

PS. sorry, but I have to post in differet messages what I would like to post in one.

Chess.com software DOES not ALLOW me to post more than one diagram in a single message, or diagram and text together!!!

Anyone experiencing the same, the Korean hackers at Chess.com?

North Korea wants the Olympics to be a fiasco and has now hacked Chess.com, my account?

Lyudmil_Tsvetkov
Tal1949 wrote:

There is no secret. 2100 OTB. 3500 behind his computer.

Every titled player in the world can claim that.

You seem to miss the 12 years time gap.

One can add a lot of strength in 12 years, 12*70 elos on average=840 elos.

So, if I had been around 2200 12 years ago, I should be now at least 3040, so very close to SF strength.

Forum Legend
Following
New Comments
Locked Topic
Pinned Topic