Descendants , it’s just that their descendants are mostly pit bull do to the way genetics works. Go to school buddy.
The stalemate rule is dumb and needs more revision. It should be considered a war crime.
Sort:
Mar 9, 2025
0
#62
#60, extinct isn’t the correct term there. That’s like saying if there was 50 golden retrievers and 500 pit bulls (just for an example) and they all interbreed that the golden retrievers went extinct. They are still in the DNA of their
Descendants , it’s just that their descendants are mostly pit bull do to the way genetics works. Go to school buddy.
Descendants , it’s just that their descendants are mostly pit bull do to the way genetics works. Go to school buddy.
Mar 9, 2025
0
#63
#61, saying I use “cheap tricks” is crazy. I literally play the King’s Indian attack EVEN IN BULLET. It is a slow positional opening
Mar 9, 2025
0
#64
Abtectous wrote:
#60, extinct isn’t the correct term there. That’s like saying if there was 50 golden retrievers and 500 pit bulls (just for an example) and they all interbreed that the golden retrievers went extinct. They are still in the DNA of their
Descendants , it’s just that their descendants are mostly pit bull do to the way genetics works. Go to school buddy.
Descendants , it’s just that their descendants are mostly pit bull do to the way genetics works. Go to school buddy.
Are you arguing that the extinct species is more capable? Do you understand how evolution ACTUALLY works? Or is your grasp of basic biology as bad as your grasp of real chess?!
Mar 9, 2025
0
#65
Abtectous wrote:
#61, saying I use “cheap tricks” is crazy. I literally play the King’s Indian attack EVEN IN BULLET. It is a slow positional opening
You can play any opening in the world if you know how to use cheap tricks or memorized positions to make the opponent think too long in a very short game. Go play that 1800 guy in a daily chess game, if you beat him I'll play you.
Mar 9, 2025
0
#66
#64, I’m assuming you don’t know about the reconstruction of the Neanderthal genome and the scientific proof that they didn’t die, were just genetically outmatched and their dna still exist into as much as 8% of ours today.
Mar 9, 2025
0
#69
Abtectous wrote:
#64, I’m assuming you don’t know about the reconstruction of the Neanderthal genome and the scientific proof that they didn’t die, were just genetically outmatched and their dna still exist into as much as 8% of ours today.
So now you're literally shifting the goalpost and using a leftover DNA residue to justify your absolutely asinine argument that the species that went extinct was more capable, especially mentally. I assure you, we weren't physically dominant over them, that's for sure.
Mar 9, 2025
0
#70
The fact that your chicken to play me proves my blitz rating scares you.
Mar 9, 2025
0
#71
Abtectous wrote:
The fact that your chicken to play me proves my blitz rating scares you.
No what concerns me is how hard you're begging to play me so I know you won't play fair. That's really it.
Share that game I want to see it. I want to see the point where you stopped playing like yourself and started finding absurdly good moves.
Mar 9, 2025
0
#72
#69, two different things dummy. But yes, Neanderthals were smarter than us. We used their bones and mostly skulls to determine brain size and brain weight, and brain weight for size which allows us to determine who is in general smarter. Yes they were more intelligent than Homo sapiens, what Homo sapiens had as an advantage was numbers. A lower mortality rate for their children allowed for more of them and they could use numbers to make up for what they lacked.
Unfortunately I can't play someone who will probably find a way to win, beyond playing the game.
Think about your record. You use cheap tricks, rely on bullet to sound like a big chess guy, talk down to better players than you, and at the end of the day, you don't do the right thing and resign when you have only a king on the board and are down like 30 points. I don't play people like that, although admittedly crushing you in chess would be nice.