I've been doing the Woodpecker Method for about 8 months now and wanted to share some thoughts.
The skepticism about whether this is just "rebranded tactics training" is fair, but what makes it distinct is the structure: fixed puzzle set, multiple cycles with decreasing time targets, tracking speed improvements. That systematic approach differs from grinding random puzzles daily.
For those asking about tools, you have several options. ChessTempo lets you create custom problem sets. Chessable has Woodpecker-like courses (including the original book). I personally use Disco Chess because it's Woodpecker-first. It organizes problems by tactical theme and allows you to practice your openings in addition to tactics puzzles (all in one system). The mistake review pulls missed puzzles into a separate queue. There are some indie projects like TacticsPecker that offers more customization if you want it.
The point about CT-Art is valid. You can do this with any fixed puzzle set and a spreadsheet. The apps just remove the tracking friction, which matters over months of consistent practice.
One thing I've noticed: the method works better when you're honest about what "solved" means. If you're pattern matching the position rather than calculating, you're not really training the skill. That's where tracking accuracy alongside speed becomes useful.
Why do you think that you are Mother Theresa? Instead of saying that you should say a kind person, because no one is like Mother Theresa.