The internet google "app".
Third term for President Obama?
Sort:
wanmokewan wrote:
*looks for the relevence to chess in this topic*
So welcome to chess.com, this here thread is in the off-topic section. See at the top? Off-topic means not on the topic of chess. Chess is the main topic, if you'd like chess relevence, dont got to the off topic threads.
Unless this got moved to off-topic in the last 10 minutes.
And on-topic to the off-topic, haha. Just haha.
Thankfully, this will remain "rumblings" and rumors and will never become "news."
If you really had a clue about how the U.S. Constitution is amend, you would know the chances of this happening before the President could run for a third term has no chance at all. For one it would never obtain the supermajority needed in D C.. Then it would have to be approved by 3/4 of the states. Go get a high school gov. book and educate yourself before you name yourself look stupid again.
BishopTARDIS wrote:
If you really had a clue about how the U.S. Constitution is amend, you would know the chances of this happening before the President could run for a third term has no chance at all. For one it would never obtain the supermajority needed in D C.. Then it would have to be approved by 3/4 of the states. Go get a high school gov. book and educate yourself before you name yourself look stupid again.
Lolz.
Thanks for the lecture pops.
Jul 27, 2014
0
#13
Why should they bother trying to pass an amendment to the US Constitution, when all branches of the government practically ignore it anyway? Imagine trying to play an opponent who continually changes the rules of the game to ensure he will be victorious. That is what we have in Washington D.C.
As much as I like O'Bamma, I would prefer to see the ticket of Hillary Clinton, and Elizabeth Warren.
Aug 7, 2014
0
#15
It's not astounding so many vote so poorly. Our founding fathers lived within "The Age of Reason." We live in the age of unreason.
FirebrandX wrote:
I find it astounding anyone would vote for Obama or Clinton next election cycle. Both have been absolutely corrupt, bald faced liars that have done everything they can to flush the US down the toilet both in foreign policy and at home in securing the borders. Wake up and do your research instead of voting for these corrupt left-wingers because it's the 'cool' thing to do.
YEP
free-at-last wrote:
She has zero chance of getting elected. She's not likable.
Voting in Clinton in 2016 would bascially be the same as Obama having a third term.
free-at-last wrote:
Are you wearing beer goggles? Besides looks are the last reason you should vote or not vote for someone.
I think she's cute, I'd vote for her. Why not? She would be a fun president.
Actually I don't know why she'd want to be President at this point. She's making a fortune on the speaking circuit. President Obama himself (and Michelle) probably already have $20 million worth of speaking engagements lined up for when they leave the White House.
There are some rumblings in D.C. about a possible push to repeal the XXII Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (1947) that set the two term limit for Presidents.
This is obviously with the intent of having Obama serve a third term (or more), as polls show that he would easily secure election in 2016 against any potential challenger.
What say you to this shocking news?