XPGK99 wrote:
One last thing: he was correct about Hiens Niemann cheating because if you accuse everyone on the platform your bound to find one who is cheating.
He has never accused anyone.
Tyson Brady has just got his GM titled and just surpassed an ELO of 3000
Sort:
Oct 25, 2024
0
#43
basketstorm wrote:
@XPGK99, my "thick skull"? What's wrong with you, you can't communicate without insults? Try again, please. As for the "prime" argument, look up his blitz rating and blitz rating of that FM. I mean real rating on FIDE website, not online (no way to prove online rating is real).
Here you can see how "weak" and "past his prime" Kramnik is in 2024:
https://www.chess.com/news/view/2024-clash-of-blames-kramnik-martinez
You really need to stop talking it's just showing how you know nothing.... I have beaten people much higher rated then me and only a small number of them who are sore losers accused me of cheating
And here's what the difference in rating between Kramnik and that FM means:
6.8% chance for that FM to win against Kramnik. Kramnik's rating is real, he proved that by playing and even winning against Martinez in real life (who was rated similarly in Blitz).
And again, Kramnik has analyzed more games of that FM. You didn't do that. You just without any reason started insulting Kramnik and dismissing everything he says.
XPGK99 wrote:
This was really good ragebait you actually got me for a while but I gtg so you can have fun starting an argument with Joseph or anyone else that you want, or you can follow in your idol's footsteps and report everyone on the platform.
Come on, I'm not rage-baiting anyone, I'm communicating in a friendly manner. If you express rage and throw insults at me, that's not my fault. Maybe you need to learn how to actually discuss things. Not just dismiss with anger and without any valid arguments and then run away. Your anger and insults did not increase weight of your posts. The opposite, actually happened. I'm still ready to hear your arguments if you have any.
Oct 25, 2024
0
#46
basketstorm wrote:
And here's what the difference in rating between Kramnik and that FM means:
6.8% chance for that FM to win against Kramnik. Kramnik's rating is real, he proved that by playing and even winning against Martinez in real life (who was rated similarly in Blitz).
And again, Kramnik has analyzed more games of that FM. You dind't do that. You just without any reason started insulting Kramnik and dismissing everything he says.
Anyone who accuses someone of cheating on a live stream is a sore loser and you just proved that it is possible for him to win
Btw I'm not protecting Kramnik or accusing his chess opponents, I'm just shocked by the amount of people who are beginners, amateurs at best but somehow sure that Kramnik is wrong. With argumentation like "oh he's just a sore loser". Come on. If you want to become chess players, you need to think harder.
basketstorm wrote:
No one is 3000 level, stop that nonsense. Magnus holds highest blitz rating 2893.2. Chess.com ratings aren't real: deflated and distorted on low side, inflated on high side.
Then you would be 200 irl
Oct 25, 2024
0
#49
basketstorm wrote:
Btw I'm not protecting Kramnik or accusing his chess opponents, I'm just shocked by the amount of people who are beginners, amateurs at best but somehow sure that Kramnik is wrong. With argumentation like "oh he's just a sore loser". Come on. If you want to become chess players, you need to think harder.
Grandmasters are often sore losers
AntiLondonPlayer wrote:
basketstorm wrote:
No one is 3000 level, stop that nonsense. Magnus holds highest blitz rating 2893.2. Chess.com ratings aren't real: deflated and distorted on low side, inflated on high side.
Then you would be 200 irl
You know what deflation is?
electrosaw wrote:
basketstorm wrote:
No one is 3000 level, stop that nonsense. Magnus holds highest blitz rating 2893.2. Chess.com ratings aren't real: deflated and distorted on low side, inflated on high side.
Bro really talking like 🤓
look at da mirror sir
joseph7505 wrote:
basketstorm wrote:
Btw I'm not protecting Kramnik or accusing his chess opponents, I'm just shocked by the amount of people who are beginners, amateurs at best but somehow sure that Kramnik is wrong. With argumentation like "oh he's just a sore loser". Come on. If you want to become chess players, you need to think harder.
Grandmasters are often sore losers
Of course, most importantly, you are not. I hope you feel better about yourself with such a world-view.
basketstorm wrote:
AntiLondonPlayer wrote:
basketstorm wrote:
No one is 3000 level, stop that nonsense. Magnus holds highest blitz rating 2893.2. Chess.com ratings aren't real: deflated and distorted on low side, inflated on high side.
Then you would be 200 irl
You know what deflation is?
R u slow magnus is 3300 chess.com that would mean that chess.com is inflated so incompetent these days
Oct 25, 2024
0
#54
basketstorm wrote:
joseph7505 wrote:
basketstorm wrote:
Btw I'm not protecting Kramnik or accusing his chess opponents, I'm just shocked by the amount of people who are beginners, amateurs at best but somehow sure that Kramnik is wrong. With argumentation like "oh he's just a sore loser". Come on. If you want to become chess players, you need to think harder.
Grandmasters are often sore losers
Of course, most importantly, you are not. I hope you feel better about yourself with such a world-view.
I don't see me calling people cheaters on live stream cuz I lost
Oct 25, 2024
0
#55
And as a 300 rated player you are at the very bottom of chess players you have no idea how often people lose to players much lower rated
AntiLondonPlayer wrote:
basketstorm wrote:
AntiLondonPlayer wrote:
basketstorm wrote:
No one is 3000 level, stop that nonsense. Magnus holds highest blitz rating 2893.2. Chess.com ratings aren't real: deflated and distorted on low side, inflated on high side.
Then you would be 200 irl
You know what deflation is?
R u slow magnus is 3300 chess.com that would mean that chess.com is inflated so incompetent these days
Go read my post again very carefully. Cuz u were 2 fast apparently and missed the point
joseph7505 wrote:
And as a 300 rated player you are at the very bottom of chess players you have no idea how often people lose to players much lower rated
As a kid you don't have enough experience either. My real rating might be much higher. While your online rating might not be real at all.
joseph7505 wrote:
basketstorm wrote:
joseph7505 wrote:
basketstorm wrote:
Btw I'm not protecting Kramnik or accusing his chess opponents, I'm just shocked by the amount of people who are beginners, amateurs at best but somehow sure that Kramnik is wrong. With argumentation like "oh he's just a sore loser". Come on. If you want to become chess players, you need to think harder.
Grandmasters are often sore losers
Of course, most importantly, you are not. I hope you feel better about yourself with such a world-view.
I don't see me calling people cheaters on live stream cuz I lost
Kramnik has never accused anyone on live stream. Reporting is not accusing. For every report he has many considerations, just the loss itself isn't the reason.
Good job. U da man.
@XPGK99, my "thick skull"? What's wrong with you, you can't communicate without insults? Try again, please. As for the "prime" argument, look up his blitz rating and blitz rating of that FM. I mean real rating on FIDE website, not online (no way to prove online rating is real).
Here you can see how "weak" and "past his prime" Kramnik is in 2024:
https://www.chess.com/news/view/2024-clash-of-blames-kramnik-martinez