Under 2000 live blitz on this site is a total joke (with proof)

Sort:
Avatar of Cherub_Enjel

I'm not kidding. If your live blitz on this site is less than 2000, you're worse than a beginner. 

Even a beginner could come on this site, sign up to be 1800, then beat computer-medium a couple of times and get the 2000 rating. Thanks to the ridiculous rating system we have here.

All you have to do to win against U2000 live blitz players is take their hanging pieces, and just play fast and don't hang anything yourself. You don't need to do anything special - just shuffle your pieces around and wait for them to hang something like the donkeys they are. 

OTB rating + 600 = Live Blitz. 

You all know who this is about. It looks like he hasn't been on this site even since Chin of Quinn beat him up pretty badly in a blitz match. 

 

Avatar of MitSud
Jeez this doesn't make me feel any MORE patzerish
Avatar of LeonSKennedy992

anyone above 1600 on this site is a solid player.

Avatar of Cherub_Enjel

If you consider 1000 USCF solid, I agree. 

Avatar of iKeemstar

Some 2000 players are just trash LOL look at this moron

Avatar of Daybreak57

All you've proven is that in blitz the games are decided by outright blunders.  Congratulations Captian obvious.  In 1600 games there are blunders as well, and there are more in 1500 games, 1400 games, etc, etc.  The biggest difference between the 2000 player in blitz and one that is only 1500 is the amount of patterns that they know, making it possible for the 2000 player to make much faster moves and making fewer mistakes than the 1500 rated player, though this doesn't necessarily mean the 1500  player can't win due to a fluke oversight.  This is your most pathetic trolling attempt by far, but I see what you are trying to do, but all you did is appeal to ignorance.  Not your ignorance, most people won't know that in blitz games are generally decided by blunders at all levels, at least I think so... else someone would have posted something by now.  All in all, I get it.  Your bored, however, this is making people look at your at a different angle.  I know someone that trolls for fun but I think you are going a bit over the top here.  This is a cautionary warning, from someone you've helped in the past.  I hope we can see eye to eye.

Avatar of iKeemstar
Daybreak57 wrote:

All you've proven is that in blitz the games are decided by outright blunders.  Congratulations Captian obvious.  In 1600 games there are blunders as well, and there are more in 1500 games, 1400 games, etc, etc.  The biggest difference between the 2000 player in blitz and one that is only 1500 is the amount of patterns that they know, making it possible for the 2000 player to make much faster moves and making fewer mistakes than the 1500 rated player, though this doesn't necessarily mean the 1500  player can't win due to a fluke oversight.  This is your most pathetic trolling attempt by far, but I see what you are trying to do, but all you did is appeal to ignorance.  Not your ignorance, most people won't know that in blitz games are generally decided by blunders at all levels, at least I think so... else someone would have posted something by now.  All in all, I get it.  Your bored, however, this is making people look at your at a different angle.  I know someone that trolls for fun but I think you are going a bit over the top here.  This is a cautionary warning, from someone you've helped in the past.  I hope we can see eye to eye.

You must have not done very well on your SATs.

Avatar of Cherub_Enjel

Yeah, wow, that 2000 got outplayed everywhere. Total domination. 

Avatar of Taurusmale67

This topic been locked at the request of the OP - Taurusmale67

This forum topic has been locked