Very strong player for his rating.

Sort:
Hummel_Chess

Hello, i played 7 games on here and i'm over 2350 fiderated. I won my first 5 games. I then came across a player who was just over 1900. I played two games against this person i started off weak in the openings in both games, but this player was extremely strong. I moved on from a site that i played on for years, to play on chess.com but from the two losses i've already experienced in only 7 games i've played i'm already getting frustrated cause i have no doubt in my mind that i've been cheated. This player's bullet rating is 3 wins 3 losses and 1078 rated and his standard rating is 1 win 1 loss and 1136 rated. But his blitz rating is 1946 i'm a very competitive player i hate losing like most of us do and especially to someone that most likely cheated.

NomadicKnight

Couldn't the guy be having a good day and yourself a bad one? Could you just be whining like a youngster who lost at a game of Battleship?

Red56
Hummel_Chess wrote:

Hello, i played 7 games on here and i'm over 2350 fiderated. I won my first 5 games. I then came across a player who was just over 1900. I played two games against this person i started off weak in the openings in both games, but this player was extremely strong. I moved on from a site that i played on for years, to play on chess.com but from the two losses i've already experienced in only 7 games i've played i'm already getting frustrated cause i have no doubt in my mind that i've been cheated. This player's bullet rating is 3 wins 3 losses and 1078 rated and his standard rating is 1 win 1 loss and 1136 rated. But his blitz rating is 1946 i'm a very competitive player i hate losing like most of us do and especially to someone that most likely cheated.

The reason the player's bullet and standard rating is much lower than his blitz rating is that (as you pointed out) he has barely played any games under the bullet/standard time controls.  Those numbers you see are provisional/not a true reflection of the players playing strength, which should explain the the huge inconsistency in his various ratings.