Vote chess comments

I have extrapolated the current position COUNTLESS times on many different chess engines with MANY different settings and nearly every one yields the same outcome: DRAW! Seeing there are NO players on team chess.com above 2100 and seeing 99% of the cheaters....er...ah.....players on team chess.com are using their programs, and seeing programs DO NOT make mistakes, this game doesnt have much more of a future. I will continue playing it out for a bit longer. How much longer, you ask? Well, I will play a few more weeks at least, but if it goes as I think it will, I will offer a draw. When my offer comes, I INSIST the team accept it.

I have been around longer than most of you people have, and I have seen tens of thousands of games. I know the makings of a draw when I see one. I am not making a premature statement when I say that my UNMATEABILITY is quite safe from your efforts. But I must hand it to you all--you stood toe-to-toe with the BEST in the business and lived to tell.

We could play one thousand games and the results would be 1-1-998. One win, one loss, 998 draws. That's what happens when 2 top progs go head to head. If and when there is a rematch with me playing as white, it wont happen until later this year.

I have analyzed your votes and it's NEVER even close between vote #1 and vote #2. It's basically me vs. RYBKA with a few DEEP FRITZ and SHREDDER votes thrown in. I know you all are thinking that it is some sort of victory for yourself seeing that I didn't win, but I did make a point. Team chess.com has some very good chess minds contemplating this game. It also had some BRAND NEW chess programs running on BRAND NEW computers for HOURS UPON HOURS of analyzation per move. I am still here. I am untouched. I am still UNMATED.

You see, people, I am a cheater. My cheating ways go BEYOND sitting at a computer transposing moves. DO you really think that I could be running 3 outdated progs on a 4 year old comp and somehow eke out a draw with 500 other cheaters? There are things so OUTRAGEOUS that I choose not to reveal, lest I be branded a total FRAUD. Perhaps I know a 2700+ GM who is assisting me. Perhaps I AM a 2700+ GM. But one thing is for sure, even though this game is not over, there is a 95% chance it is a draw.

I took the best that this site has to offer..players and cheaters from all over the WORLD, and I can still say that I am UNMATEABLE! 

Yeah I figured this would be a draw (no I am not using a chess program, only my brain).

Good game in advance. I'll be waiting for the draw offer :-D

One on One against me you'd be lucky to get a draw. I'm fairly confident that you're the only one on this site that doubts it. But if that is true why are you ducking me? Don't let fear and common sense get in the way!

FYI: You're about to discover that not all roads lead to Rome. Go read our blog. I should add. It is because I don't use my computer that you will soon find yourself in difficulty.

WEBGOGS... You INSIST you are a legit player (who just happens to to find it all too easy to use progs to play vote chess)  and really want to play me and my progs. Why? I just dont get it. My offer still stands: PROVE TO ME THAT ANY HUMAN ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH AT ANY TIME HAS BEATEN ANY PROFESSIOANL PROGRAM IN A GAME UNDER 30 MINUTES PER SIDE AND I WILL PLAY ANYONE, ANYTIME, ANY TIME CONTROLS. Period. The fact is that it hasnt ever been done. EVER. Get my point. EVER! You would lose as everyone else has webgogs. Can you read my writing. YOU....WILL....LOSE......Do you really expect me to think you are better than kasparov, kramnik, anand, fischer, etc?

Besides webgogs, EVERY single move in our vote chess game were moves YOU yourself supported. What does that tell you? My prog would draw your prog.

Your analyzations of games are textbook CHESSMASTER cut and paste plagiarizations. I didnt just fall off the turnip truck you know.

Erik is taking his TOGA III to Hawaii. PUELIN is doing the same. 4 Seasons VIP & SIO.

BANZAI

No,you are making an immature statement,because you said a few days ago that you will consider the draw as a loss.Now you are ready to offer a draw(what a liar!!!),in spite of your previous statements.

By the way,do you know why the yellow faces are laughing all the time above the title of your vote game(''Self-proclaimed best computer player'')?

But to be honest,thank you for offering me so amusing moments at work.Are you a comedian maybe?

Here's the thing you guys, it's as clear as day - listen: Cheater knows that at some point his character will be "played out". He started it as a joke, just to rile some people, but he's come to be very affectionate of the character he made - it succeeded beyond his expectations and he's become attached to the role. He knows it will die out soon, but he is absolutely loathe to see it go. Do you see how he hints at another vote game later in the summer, hoping that he can keep it up? He's struggling right now because he can taste the end, he knows he'll likely have to retire the account. So here's the thing - he's trying to go out with a bang, he's playing it up, as it were, he's trying to get in as much cheater_1 as there is left, don't you all see? He's squeezing the last juices out of what he's made.

All good things come to an end, my friend. It was a grand run. Go out with a beautiful bang, don't hang on. The longer you try to prolong it the more you decay the potency of what you've done, as I'm sure you anticipate. Be elegant and happy. Celebrate.

  Skills? I thought I knew what it meant but now...

I feel the need to write a MANIFESTO. I feel the need to clobber you all over your heads with FACTS so you all get it. I may have to write it in my BLOG seeing it will be pretty long, but I'll start out with a paraphrased version here.

#1 GM JOEL BENJAMIN was (fairly recently) DECIMATED by RYBKA 4.5-1.5. THere are other matches where he went 4.5-3.5 but he has never won a series yet...Mr. benjamin is rated 2600+. Rybka even had to give up a PAWN to make it fair.

#2 I MONITOR your comments in the vote chess game and I see ONE or TWO people analyze the position for HOURS and then post "MOVE PAWN TO e5 ." Then all the little clones move to e5. I AM, for all intents and purposes, PLAYING DEEP FRITZ AND RYBKA.

#3 If rybka can can make Joel Benjamin look like BOBO the monkey from chessmaster, then you'd think that wimpy, loudmouth, arrogant, phoney, cheater_1 will get MURDERED by rybka. Who's got the last laugh now you FOOLS!

#4 The fact is that this game WILL BE A DRAW. Tulsadavid likes to point out that I lied about it being a draw. Well, It is a draw, anyone with an above average knowledge of chess can see it--ESPECIALLY when it's prog vs prog. Progs dont make mistakes. I will recind my comment about no one being above 2100 in our game...EVERYONE IS above 2100. THEY are all using programs!!!

#5 And to think that I thought I was arrogant! I spend several minutes each day DELETING messages and offers and threats to play someone who thinks that they can beat me.

PEOPLE...LISTEN UP..... If the #3 rated player in the USA gets made a fool of by Rybka, and I, cheater_1 am playing against Rybka here and now, and Rybka is having one HECK of a time recovering from it's BOTCHED OPENING in our vote chess game, then what ARROGANCE you all possess to challenge me one on one. WHAT ARROGANCE!!!! I am going toe to toe with DEEP FRITZ, Rybka, shredder, people ABOVE 2100 (as tulsadavid believes) and I AM UP a PAWN.  You expect me to believe that LEKO, ANAND, KRAMNIK are regulars on this website. Gimme a break!! More often than not, the people that are challenging me are competitive 16 year olds with Deep Fritz on a quad-core machine just hoping that I will fall into their trap. HA! You couldn't mate me even with that set up.

As I said before, I may not win every game I play, but I cannot be mated. As for the other group of people that want to play program vs program....WHY? I am playing 500 fellow cheaters from all over the world, and this game SYMBOLIZES what happens when programs play against each other. Draw. Are you just hoping you'll get lucky and be the first to checkmate me? I just don't get it.

Now, I have made my case. I'll summarize for you A.D.D. people. I'll use a new approach, so FOLLOW ALONG. One of the top players in the world is ANAND (2795). One of the top programs in the world was REBEL. Rebel played ANAND and won 5-3, winning several games in UNDER 30 moves. I USE rebel. I am using it against Team chess.com. Team chess.com has NO ONE NEAR ANAND on it. If anyone out there wants to challenge me and professes that they will NOT use a program but use their brain and actually can CHECKMATE me, then I have this overwhelming urge for violence wash over me. Am I dealing with Buffoons on this site? Even if you ARE ANAND..youd LOSE. You might as well say that youre bobby fischer's illegitimate son and want to play me. There is NO HUMAN being that can checkmate a computer with these types of time controls. It cant be done. Now, if you all want to come clean and say you'll be using a program against mine......then that's a different story. Oddly enough, that is what is happening now. Use this vote chess game as an example of my UNMATEABILITY. I may not checkmate team chess.com, but I will remain undefeated.

Please....PRETTY PLEASE....everyone....please.....stop....challenging....me. Pretty please. I have put my money where my mouth is. I have talked the talk and WALKED the walk. I have proved I'm no poser. I have backed up what I said. At the conclusion of this game, I will resume my regular posts on this site. I find it more of a challenge to debate you all on the various topics as opposed to playing chess---much as one would find it a challenge to debate the meaning of life with a rock.

In my opinion, this vote game should have been a battle between human creativity and computer calculation.  While a single computer can indeed calculate coldly indefinitely until it arrives at a single, perfect move, humans still have the capacity for invention; for wild creativity.  That a computer cannot replicate.  Though a human can see more abstract moves that a computer might pass over or regard as irrelevant, I believe that with that same gift of the human mind, the human can capitalize.

Instead of a wooden debate between human and machine, the "mind" team is said to be collaborating with machines.  If that is true, then the underlying point of the game is completely muddled, and it is reduced to nothing but a battle of processor power; of code strength; of floating point speed.  

Without a computer, the human team may lose, but could a machine replicate their novel, albiet failed tries for invention?  A computer would have chosen the best move, as bland or cold as it may be.  Even if cheater_1 had intervened to determine a more elegant move, he would still be using his innate creativity to impose the human eye for imagination upon the machine.

Sorry if I started rambling somewhere in there, but I think that people lost the real theme of a computer vs. human legion game; to pit creativity against calculation. 

Cheater your MANIFESTO is Solid as GRANITE.

You won already!   BANZAI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!