notmtwain wrote:
So I guess Chess.com should ban (or punish) both of them for violating TOS?
what are the chances of playing hikaru nakamura here on chess.com
Sort:
EscherehcsE wrote:
notmtwain wrote:
So I guess Chess.com should ban (or punish) both of them for violating TOS?
In the spirit of the thread, I don't think one needs to make a federal case out of it.
/ Everyone here must now fear that the other guy might have Hikaru take over.
between slim and none?
Oct 26, 2017
0
#25
notmtwain wrote:
EscherehcsE wrote:
notmtwain wrote:
So I guess Chess.com should ban (or punish) both of them for violating TOS?
In the spirit of the thread, I don't think one needs to make a federal case out of it...
No big deal, just pointing out the obvious double standard. :)
Oct 26, 2017
0
#26
dfgh123 wrote:
punish the 1700 player but not the titled player, you can always rebuild and get new players at the bottom of the ladder
If staff said anything to Naka at all, it was probably along the lines of "Hikaru, please don't do that any more, but if you do, please don't tweet about it." lol
notmtwain wrote:
Ignoring the false outrage herein, I think this is cool! Nice to see a couple people having such fun with chess! On a train!
I played Hikaru once in a 30 move "Nakamura's Knockouts" game. Yeah. He knocked me out.
Maybe you need to be at least a GM or IM to have a chance to play with Hikaru
Just last week there was a thread about how Hikaru took over some 1700's account (at the guy's request) and delivered some serious beatings.
Getting recognized randomly on the train into NYC and then helping the guy smash poor souls at blitz on
@chesscom is#thelife