What are the requirements to make WNM

Sort:
Avatar of Martin_Stahl
theswooze wro

There he is! Just in the nick of time.

I've been here since page one wink

Avatar of magipi
Martin_Stahl wrote:
theswooze wro

There he is! Just in the nick of time.

I've been here since page one

And you think that "He is also a moron and a blow hard" is a fine comment?

Avatar of Martin_Stahl

It's not really very kind but not something that normally would get moderated.

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
PsychoMatthew wrote:
Martin likes to choose against who he moderates… usually picks sides. We are all very used to it

I don't take sides.

Avatar of JosephReidNZ

Aim for WCM

Avatar of thechessnoob12345
JosephReidNZ wrote:

Aim for WCM

omg i remember seeing your acc once as number 1 puzzle rush

Avatar of David
theswooze wrote:
David wrote:
theswooze wrote:
David wrote:
theswooze wrote:
David wrote:
Lilyana wrote:

its `12 in the morning rn... cant deal with this

Or get a mod to come into the thread and close it or the discussion down.

how old are you?

Why?

because you have the roughly equivalent argumentative skills and level of common sense as a twelve year old.

That’s amusing, since you clearly have the emotional maturity of a 12 year old.

I also suspect that you meant to use the noun “argumentation” rather than the adjective “argumentative”. See how easy it is to kick up a fuss about the little things while completely ignoring the larger point being made? Which is all you’ve done this entire thread.

i see your grammar skills are about as good as your logic skills. argumentative is the correct adjective. it modifies the noun 'skills', numb nutz.

Not when "argumentative" is most commonly used in the context of someone who is given to arguing or wanting to argue, which makes no sense as a modifier in this case (although it makes complete sense in terms of your own personality, since you clearly have some sort childhood trauma that you've yet to see a therapist about: I see the occasional YouTuber recommending https://www.betterhelp.com/, you should definitely give them a try).

Avatar of David
Martin_Stahl wrote:

It's not really very kind but not something that normally would get moderated.

Yeah, despite Erik's aspirational desire for the forums, that's been pretty far from the reality, and even if there were more than enough moderators in the whole world, how does one even judge kindness? I've been sarcastic and dismissive whereas @theswooze has just been nasty and pathetic.

Avatar of Aboceline1900
UsernameInDecadence wrote:

althought I wish they got rid of women's titles all together because women are frickin to smart for us to be going easy on them

They have woman titles because barely any woman do chess so they make it easy to get more girls to do chess.

Avatar of Aboceline1900
sleepyporcyy wrote:

The requirements for NM and WNM depend on the country because those titles are national titles

I also dont think the title of WNM exists in most places? WFM is the closest thing to an NM title as far as I know...

The closest thing to NM is CM

Avatar of Aboceline1900
theswooze wrote:
PsychoMatthew wrote:
Btw, just now reading all comments. This David dude is the most boring member ever😴😴😴😴😴

He is also a moron and a blow hard.

boo @theswooze

Avatar of Aboceline1900
theswooze wrote:
David wrote:
theswooze wrote:
David wrote:
theswooze wrote:
David wrote:
theswooze wrote:
David wrote:
Lilyana wrote:

its `12 in the morning rn... cant deal with this

Or get a mod to come into the thread and close it or the discussion down.

how old are you?

Why?

because you have the roughly equivalent argumentative skills and level of common sense as a twelve year old.

That’s amusing, since you clearly have the emotional maturity of a 12 year old.

I also suspect that you meant to use the noun “argumentation” rather than the adjective “argumentative”. See how easy it is to kick up a fuss about the little things while completely ignoring the larger point being made? Which is all you’ve done this entire thread.

i see your grammar skills are about as good as your logic skills. argumentative is the correct adjective. it modifies the noun 'skills', numb nutz.

Not when "argumentative" is most commonly used in the context of someone who is given to arguing or wanting to argue, which makes no sense as a modifier in this case (although it makes complete sense in terms of your own personality, since you clearly have some sort childhood trauma that you've yet to see a therapist about: I see the occasional YouTuber recommending https://www.betterhelp.com/, you should definitely give them a try).

god you are such a moron on so many levels. dont forget to wear you helmet and knee pads.

Idk how bro did not get reported yet