What do you think is a good rapid chess rating?

I will only respect players with a rapid rating of at least 1077. 

For the original OP...

I think that rating is only Relative to your goals and to your dedication to the game.

Some may say 1300 is a good rating for rapid

Some may say 1500 is a good rating for rapid

Some may say 1700+ is a good rating or

Some may say 2000+ is a good rating

The point is "good" is only relative to what you think good is, some people may not have the same dedication, time or energy to play chess and some people consider it a hobby and some consider it as a career, so it depends on your goals. 

Try not to let people bend them to much as the goal of the game is yes to be competitive and to improve but also to have fun. But "good" is something that is not concrete so it is only dependant on you.

looooooool the OP is 1076 is see what you did there

Well, now my rating has increased, and it is 1078.

nice!

It’s a new high for me

nice, we always want members to increase so any progress is always important!

What we think of your rating is immaterial. What do you think of it? Do you want to accept it, or strive for better? Do you want to study, practice and analyze to improve? Or are you happy with where you are at? Only you can decide that. There is no right or wrong - there is only what you are comfortable and happy with. Good luck either way.

@m_connors very true...

thats great

The demand for quality play is gradually increasing these days, and therefore, I only respect players with a rapid rating of at least 1079. 

._.

My rating used to be 600, and in a matter of days it became 1000+

same

My blitz rating used to be 900. Now it's 1780

Now my rating for rapid is 1080, a new high.

I played against @MaNv49 2 matches, and he crushed me in the first round, then I got better in the second round.

My blitz percent is 94.1

My Rapid percent is 96.7%