Still waiting for someone to explain to me how abstract strategy games like chess can't make you smarter when there are tests designed to measure generalized intelligence that are accurate predictors of future academic success with questions like this:
http://www.test-guide.com/component/com_bfquiz_plus/Itemid,442/catid,279/view,bfquizplus/
Either you dispute chess could help you improve your ability to solve these types of abstract puzzles or you dispute the test's legitimacy. ASVAB is not the only test that uses these kinds of questions, the IQ test uses it too as well as many others.
Next you'll say that playing chess can't possibly help you in playing Shogi or Xiangqi.
what does chess help you improve?


It makes you more analytical in day to day life. You take more time to think things through versus acting on your first impulse.

It makes you more analytical in day to day life. You take more time to think things through versus acting on your first impulse.
YES! Thats my opinion too.

Similarly to learning a new language, becoming fluent in chess would give one similar benefits Id imagine.

Chess helps me land the ladies.
Driving your 9 year old niece and her two friends to the scholastic chess tourny doesnt count lol

it helps me improve avoiding other things I could be doing. Its actually great at that, better than anything else. And writing on forums helps me avoid playing and learning chess.

it helps me improve avoiding other things I could be doing. Its actually great at that, better than anything else. And writing on forums helps me avoid playing and learning chess.
Should we psychoanalyze this startling honesty?

it helps me improve avoiding other things I could be doing. Its actually great at that, better than anything else. And writing on forums helps me avoid playing and learning chess.
Sayyyyyyyyy... have you been copying my award winning slackers techniques... :D

huh
lol... arn't you supposed to be in school?... you're not... slacking off... are you :D

Chess is akin to fly fishing, those who do it well are professional wasters of time.
Hmmmm... not sure about this... Im both not great at chess AND a professional waster of time :D

Chess has a tendency of improving your chances of not attracting women.
I hope that is not true. I am single and I am trying to have my cake and eat it too.

it helps me improve avoiding other things I could be doing. Its actually great at that, better than anything else. And writing on forums helps me avoid playing and learning chess.
Should we psychoanalyze this startling honesty?
oops, I thought no one was watching.

Your brain is similar to your muscles in that it can be exercised and improved, and if it's not used it will atrophy.
I have no doubt that in some way chess increases your mental acuity, perhaps in spatial recognition or abstract visualization.
I just Googled this now:
http://www.chessvibes.com/reports/10-big-brain-benefits-of-playing-chess
'10 big brain benefits of playing chess'

Not for nothing is chess known as "the game of kings." No doubt the rulers of empires and kingdoms saw in the game fitting practice for the strategizing and forecasting they themselves were required to do when dealing with other monarchs and challengers. As we learn more about the brain, some are beginning to push for chess to be reintroduced as a tool in the public's education. With benefits like these, they have a strong case.
1. It can raise your IQ
Chess has always had an image problem, being seen as a game for brainiacs and people with already high IQs. So there has been a bit of a chicken-and-egg situation: do smart people gravitate towards chess, or does playing chess make them smart? At least one study has shown that moving those knights and rooks around can in fact raise a person's intelligence quotient. A study of 4,000 Venezuelan students produced significant rises in the IQ scores of both boys and girls after 4 months of chess instruction.
2. It helps prevent Alzheimer's
Because the brain works like a muscle, it needs exercise like any bicep or quad to be healthy and ward off injury. A recent study featured in The New England Journal of Medicine found that people over 75 who engage in brain-stretching activities like chess are less likely to develop dementia than their non-board-game-playing peers. Just like an un-exercised muscle loses strength, Dr. Robert Freidland, the study's author, found that unused brain tissue leads to a loss of brain power. So that's all the more reason to play chess before you turn 75.
3. It exercises both sides of the brain
In a German study, researchers showed chess experts and novices simple geometric shapes and chess positions and measured the subjects' reactions in identifying them. They expected to find the experts' left brains being much more active, but they did not expect the right hemisphere of the brain to do so as well. Their reaction times to the simple shapes were the same, but the experts were using both sides of their brains to more quickly respond to the chess position questions.
4. It increases your creativity
Since the right hemisphere of the brain is responsible for creativity, it should come as no surprise that activating the right side of your brain helps develop your creative side. Specifically, chess greatly increases originality. One four-year study had students from grades 7 to 9 play chess, use computers, or do other activities once a week for 32 weeks to see which activity fostered the most growth in creative thinking. The chess group scored higher in all measures of creativity, with originality being their biggest area of gain.
5. It improves your memory
Chess players know — as an anecdote — that playing chess improves your memory. Being a good player means remembering how your opponent has operated in the past and recalling moves that have helped you win before. But there's hard evidence also. In a two-year study in 1985, young students who were given regular opportunities to play chess improved their grades in all subjects, and their teachers noticed better memory and better organizational skills in the kids. A similar study of Pennsylvania sixth-graders found similar results. Students who had never before played chess improved their memories and verbal skills after playing.
6. It increases problem-solving skills
A chess match is like one big puzzle that needs solving, and solving on the fly, because your opponent is constantly changing the parameters. Nearly 450 fifth-grade students were split into three groups in a 1992 study in New Brunswick. Group A was the control group and went through the traditional math curriculum. Group B supplemented the math with chess instruction after first grade, and Group C began the chess in first grade. On a standardized test, Group C's grades went up to 81.2% from 62% and outpaced Group A by 21.46%.
7. It improves reading skills
In an oft-cited 1991 study, Dr. Stuart Margulies studied the reading performance of 53 elementary school students who participated in a chess program and evaluated them compared to non-chess-playing students in the district and around the country. He found definitive results that playing chess caused increased performance in reading. In a district where the average students tested below the national average, kids from the district who played the game tested above it.
8. It improves concentration
Chess masters might come off like scattered nutty professors, but the truth is their antics during games are usually the result of intense concentration that the game demands and improves in its players. Looking away or thinking about something else for even a moment can result in the loss of a match, as an opponent is not required to tell you how he moved if you didn't pay attention. Numerous studies of students in the U.S., Russia, China, and elsewhere have proven time and again that young people's ability to focus is sharpened with chess.
9. It grows dendrites
Dendrites are the tree-like branches that conduct signals from other neural cells into the neurons they are attached to. Think of them like antennas picking up signals from other brain cells. The more antennas you have and the bigger they are, the more signals you'll pick up. Learning a new skill like chess-playing causes dendrites to grow. But that growth doesn't stop once you've learned the game; interaction with people in challenging activities also fuels dendrite growth, and chess is a perfect example.
10. It teaches planning and foresight
Having teenagers play chess might just save their lives. It goes like this: one of the last parts of the brain to develop is the prefrontal cortex, the area of the brain responsible for planning, judgment, and self-control. So adolescents are scientifically immature until this part develops. Strategy games like chess can promote prefrontal cortex development and help them make better decisions in all areas of life, perhaps keeping them from making a stupid, risky choice of the kind associated with being a teenager.
The only "direct causal link" that I've seen ever in more than thirty years of teaching is that students who do not do the assignments do not pass. Everything else is might, may, usually, possibly, probably... These affects are far more than simple correlation, and something other than clear causation. If you will comprehend the nature of research in the human sciences, you must get out of your black and white thinking.
I've seen the very best teachers ruin promising students, but never through a direct causal link. I've seen the very worst teachers help students who bring very little in the way of personal capacities. I have known many an able man ruined by Chess (link) and I have friends who were young learning disabled students when I met them, and chess was one of several factors crucial to their present success. Parents have told me that my chess class and the interest it stimulated led to drastic behavioral improvements in their children. For others, it revealed serious behavioral problems that remained hidden in the absence of chess competition.
The OP asked, "what does chess help you improve?" The answers are many and varied, but they are all tentative. It may help many things and often does, but it does not guarantee success. Time spent on chess does not even guarantee improvement in chess skill.
Think of your close personal friends who died from cancer despite the treatments that helped other friends of yours to live another year or even to return to a normal healthy state with no evidence of that threat to their lives. There's a lot in medicine that is strongly or even weakly indicative of possible or probable success without an explicit "direct causal link."
Your criterion is not always relevant in the hard sciences. It is never relevant in the human sciences.
Ok, so you're not asserting a direct causation between chess-playing and academic improvement. Gotcha.
And yes, everything always is in theory might/may/probably/etc. as you said. All that's saying (basically) is there's no such thing as 100% certainty in this universe. I know that and nobody I know of expects it. That doesn't mean there aren't degrees of certainty either, and I realize you're arguing precisely this.
That said, you're missing the main point: you have to draw "black and white thinking" lines in formal science, and that black and white line between any two objects (chess-playing and academic performance in this case) is causation: direct, indirect, or none at all. Once you've definitively established the correct form of causation, then you've basically said (from a formal scientific point of view, which is the one that matters most) "ok, we have 'enough' evidence to say with 'enough' certainty that the relationship between these two objects is [direct/indirect/none]." Anything less than this is, to some extent, speculation, and while there are varying degrees of speculation ("I believe alternate universes exist" versus "I believe my son will come home from school at 4:00 P.M. today"), the point is anything less than some form of definitive causastion is, by the black and white standards of science, grounds for appreciable (non-theoretical) uncertainty.
Getting back more to chess-playing and its relationship to academic performance, I suspect it does have some positive affects on it. But I also suspect that the effects are less than some might believe, and I also suspect that the type of chess activity (merely playing a game versus reviewing annotated master-level games) makes a difference. In addition to some other variables. But these are merely intuitive guesses on my part, and I'm not going to pretend they're anything but. Unfortunately, some people here seem incapable of distinguishing between their own biased intuitions/experiences/prejudices and what we can actually say with reasonable certainty from rigorously-performed, well-documented science. Personal stories are fine for this thread of course, but don't pass this stuff off as "evidence" (beyond maybe circumstantial) either.
And treating cancer (i.e. something that's essentially a life or death matter) is not at all the same as establishing an accurate belief system (i.e. something that's essentially a non-life or death matter). Cancer treatments don't necessarily have the same kinds of black and white standards that need to be met; belief systems about how the universe operates (e.g. whether or not the earth is flat, whether aliens live on Mars, the Earth's gravitational constant, the boiling point of water, whether or not chess-playing causes improved academic performance) do.
Others have labored to demonstrate in this thread that something more than intuitive guesses are available even though we would prefer a much larger number of rigorous studies.
I am beginning to think that our views are not as far apart as it first seems. I've been trying to acknowledge "the effects are less than some might believe" while insisting that they are substantially more than intuitive guesses.
I believe that analysis and training, not simply playing, is necessary to gain whatever secondary academic benefits may accrue from chess. The social and emotional benefits require competition and, especially for young children, proper adult guidance. "Win with grace, lose with dignity," as Susan Polgar likes to say.
There are two extreme views that dominate these discussions:
a) chess offers no secondary benefits, and
b) chess has proven educational / social / emotional benefits.
Both of these views are wrong.