A move must fit all of the following criteria to be "brilliant":
- It must be the best move possible.
- It must be a sacrifice (not necessarily forced) that has very easy compensation.
- It must be at least somewhat unintuitive (at least to the average player).
- It must look like a blunder (or unnecessary) to someone who has virtually no knowledge of chess.
- It must put your opponent in Zugzwang (or otherwise leave them with no good move).
That's all there is to it.
A move must fit all of the following criteria to be "brilliant":
- It must be the best move possible.
- It must be a sacrifice (not necessarily forced) that has very easy compensation.
- It must be at least somewhat unintuitive (at least to the average player).
- It must look like a blunder (or unnecessary) to someone who has virtually no knowledge of chess.
- It must put your opponent in Zugzwang (or otherwise leave them with no good move).
That's all there is to it.
POV when you get a brilliant move but then it compares your brilliant move with the best move ☠️☠️
experienced
A move must fit all of the following criteria to be "brilliant":
- It must be the best move possible.
- It must be a sacrifice (not necessarily forced) that has very easy compensation.
- It must be at least somewhat unintuitive (at least to the average player).
- It must look like a blunder (or unnecessary) to someone who has virtually no knowledge of chess.
- It must put your opponent in Zugzwang (or otherwise leave them with no good move).
That's all there is to it.
Your first 3 criteria look reasonable, but that's not how chess.com uses "brilliant".
What you wrote about zugzwang suggests that you misunderstand that word.
I've gotten like 8 in my chess career and i've been playing for like only 5 years. It's satisfying to get one but really difficult. I recommend analyzing as many games as you can and think! Here's a link to a free game review website if you don't have a membership for chess.com:
Also, here's a position from a game played by Mikhail Tal with two brilliants (he's playing as white)
Anyways... would you rather.... A 100% accuracy or a Brilliant MOVE. UR CHOICE
Why would you like to have brilliant moves?
Isn't it better to just win?
the rarity is just… I don’t even know how to describe. It makes you proud of urself!
IT TAKES EVERYTHING... ALL U GOT TO GET A BRILLIANT MOVE.
it’s everything… SACRIFICE!!
Why would you like to have brilliant moves?
Isn't it better to just win?
the rarity is just… I don’t even know how to describe. It makes you proud of urself!
tbf though I get one every few days sometimes even twice a day
will a brilliant move make you happy? really? that's what you're after? PATHETIC
you're still after a good move.
Brilliant moves are hard to get, REALLY HARD, and shaming somebody for wanting one is like shaming somebody for taking 90 years to just make a Time Machine.
Why would you like to have brilliant moves?
Isn't it better to just win?
the rarity is just… I don’t even know how to describe. It makes you proud of urself!
tbf though I get one every few days sometimes even twice a day
wow u must be skilled then
The knight sacrifice is brilliant. !!