https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/978412986488217603/1108530748211859486/board.jpg Here Nxe5 is a brilliant move because if pawn takes, the queen takes forking the king and knight. if nothing happens, the queen is gone. P Thank you to @CAMERONI13, who was with me in person and helped me make the move.
what does it take to get a brilliant move!

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/78295203733?tab=analysis in this game Re7+ is a brilliant move because I sacrificed the ROOOOOOK to make a discovered attack on the queen, which made him resign.
why did he resign?

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/pgn/32Jyw8hhrE?tab=review has a brilliant move and it sacrifices the queen. here's the brilliant move:
review it if you want

Rook takes g4 is considered a brilliant move, this is one I got fairly recently but I don't know how to attach the game so these screenshots should be good enough, I think the idea is that if bishop takes rook, the queen takes the pawn on f3 and if the bishop takes the other rook its forced checkmate and it's very difficult to avoid, i'm not sure exactly what makes this brilliant and not just best move but yeah this is my contribution
it allows black to fork pieces though

Do you guys think the computer factors in elo when deciding if a move is brilliant? I'm wondering because it seems as though beginners get close to the same amount of brilliant moves as advanced players, so maybe it's with respect to your rating? For example, I know I once got a brilliant move on a tactic that probably would have been obvious for anyone above like 1800.

Well usually brilliant moves involve sacrificing a piece(or pieces), usually important pieces to either win material, checkmating the king or to gain stalemate.
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/78295203733?tab=analysis in this game Re7+ is a brilliant move because I sacrificed the ROOOOOOK to make a discovered attack on the queen, which made him resign.