You can makes up all kinds of ways chess or anything else is supposedly good for something else.
You can say gambling is good because it involves thinking about probabilities and about predicting and visualizing how things are going to go.
You can say playing pool is good for mechanical engineering because you have to view up all the physics of the ball and consider what will happen and make a judgement based partly on theory and partly on human judgement.
You can say spending all day playing videogames must be good because hey they train your visual abilities and your skills and you must have a vast sum of knowledge to succeed in some tasks.
You can say watching tv is good because you are actually studying people's interactions with each other and so understand society and people better.
All of these arguments are hopeless, they don't show chess as being good for anything.
Yeah... we all know.
Chess is enjoyable, it is good to fill the hours, and it's a way of comparing wits and intellectual ability. However... it doesn't, at first glance, appear to be a very useful pursuit. I often tell people that Chess is probably the most useless activity that I regularly engage in, especially when considering how much time I have devoted to it over the span of my life!
What is Chess ACTUALLY good for in the non-chess "real world"? Anything?
This is what I've noticed.
Chess requires compex visualization of a sequential nature. Any field of study involving complex interactions over time (example: mechanical engineering) can benefit from honing these types of abilities. Chess also involves (when played correctly) evaluation of material trades, often in a variable scenario depending on the order of the trades. This seems a lot like certain elements of financial planning and other fields involving trades of volatile commodities. Finally, Chess seems to have a VAST field of knowlege that must be absorbed and applied before a player really begins to excel at the game. I cannot help but think that this aspect of Chess would tend to serve the practitioner in almost ANY real-world endeavor should he or she apply the same level of discipline, research, and memorization to it.
What do you all see as the "usefulness" of Chess? Is it truly as worthless a pursuit as most people think of It, or are there certain elements of the game that can be applied to non-chess pursuits?