What is Consider a Good Chess Rating on this Site?

Sort:
DestroyTheJarrr
deadmemer1 wrote:
TheRealThreat wrote:

What is consider a good rating on the site. Well, I think if you are rated above 1800 then you are a good chess player. If you are rated 1500-1799 then you are average. What do you think?

Bro got 13 dislikes when his opinion isn't even that far off the spectrum lol. Bunch of angry kids that are like "GWRRRR I IS NOT BAD AT CHESS"

average on this site is literally about 750. not 1500. 1500 is literally around top 4%. that's not average. 

huddsblue

If you're rated 1500 then you're comfortably in the top 10% or even 5% of active chess players. That's well above average. Anyone who says otherwise is either completely unaware of how average people play or is just trying to big themselves up.

Terminator-T800

I think 1500 is just starting to get good at the game.  That's how I feel about myself. 

Ziryab

2943

Rhyperior464
Ziryab wrote:

2943

LOL we all wish

Ziryab
Rhyperior464 wrote:
Ziryab wrote:

2943

LOL we all wish

renan_cabral05

my rating is terrible, almost 700 and I wanted to go up, but I think it's not just about the skill, you need to much time too

blueemu

Where are the ratings of yesterday?

Gone, like the melting snow.

DreamscapeHorizons

1919.

Rhyperior464

wow xd

RapidKnightEthan

help im not good atchess

Ziryab
RapidKnightEthan wrote:

help im not good atchess

https://www.chess.com/puzzles/rated

DestroyTheJarrr
Ziryab wrote:
Rhyperior464 wrote:
Ziryab wrote:

2943

LOL we all wish

 

yo we talking about actual rating not puzzle rating lol

Rhyperior464

Yeah rapid  rating

Ziryab
DestroyTheJarrr wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
Rhyperior464 wrote:
Ziryab wrote:

2943

LOL we all wish

 

yo we talking about actual rating not puzzle rating lol

2956

p0rc

Anything above 2400 in the blitz pool on chess.com.

deadmemer1
DestroyTheJarrr wrote:
deadmemer1 wrote:
TheRealThreat wrote:

What is consider a good rating on the site. Well, I think if you are rated above 1800 then you are a good chess player. If you are rated 1500-1799 then you are average. What do you think?

Bro got 13 dislikes when his opinion isn't even that far off the spectrum lol. Bunch of angry kids that are like "GWRRRR I IS NOT BAD AT CHESS"

average on this site is literally about 750. not 1500. 1500 is literally around top 4%. that's not average. 

That's because there are a lot of people that have never played chess that make an account here and just get a crazy low elo then quit because they don't win. I'm talking about average among people that actually play chess more than just a little bit.

DestroyTheJarrr
p0rc wrote:

Anything above 2400 in the blitz pool on chess.com.

we said avg, not the top players lmao

DestroyTheJarrr
deadmemer1 wrote:
DestroyTheJarrr wrote:
deadmemer1 wrote:
TheRealThreat wrote:

What is consider a good rating on the site. Well, I think if you are rated above 1800 then you are a good chess player. If you are rated 1500-1799 then you are average. What do you think?

Bro got 13 dislikes when his opinion isn't even that far off the spectrum lol. Bunch of angry kids that are like "GWRRRR I IS NOT BAD AT CHESS"

average on this site is literally about 750. not 1500. 1500 is literally around top 4%. that's not average. 

That's because there are a lot of people that have never played chess that make an account here and just get a crazy low elo then quit because they don't win. I'm talking about average among people that actually play chess more than just a little bit.

yet that's still wrong. I'm 1400, and of the 50-ish people in my senior year, I'm #1. The fact that u think the avg is around there is insane

DestroyTheJarrr
shangtsung111 wrote:

2700 rapid

lmfao