Unrated 3|0 games vs random stranger are like this
-
-
Unrated 10|0 games vs strangers are like...
-
-
What is considered to be the main rating on Chess.com?
Sort:
Jan 22, 2021
0
#63
"Rapid ratings are the real skill"
No, rapid ratings are where people barely know how the horsey moves.
Jan 23, 2021
0
#64
llama47 wrote:
"Rapid ratings are the real skill"
No, rapid ratings are where people barely know how the horsey moves.
Wait, who said rapid ratings are the real skill?
Your comments don't really make much sense anyways.
Jan 23, 2021
0
#65
goldenbeer wrote:
I think blitz is the most important. Bullet has very little to do with chess, classic has no fan, rapid is the fist of engine assistant games, blitz is not as crazy as bullet and also there aren’t many players who cheat in blitz (maybe less than 20%, unlike in rapid where well over 50% are either just use engine assistance or use engine for all movea).
You are completely out of your MIND if you think the numbers are that high. 50%??? I only play rapid and I'm pretty sure it's way less than 5%. To think Blitz is anywhere near 20% would be just as insane. The numbers simply aren't even close to that, it would ruin it completely.
Корисник nTzT је написао:
what is problem do you want punch?
Корисник nTzT је написао:
Stop spamming you ape
- you want me to tell you want some little trouble 
Корисник nTzT је написао:
Stop spamming you ape
-you want us to fight come in Los Angeles
do you wan 1v1 in chess add me friends loser
Jan 23, 2021
0
#70
goldenbeer wrote:
@nTzT, either you are an idiot and cannot recognize engine assistance or since you are playing in a way lower basket you don’t face such players. Just today I’ve played some rapid games and aborted some others and I’m pretty sure at least 70% of my opponents where using engine assist. I won most of them but thanks to their weak skills, mostly I won when they fall in time scramble (yes in rapid using engine assistance they fall in time scramble). Engine assistance doesn’t mean you don’t think yourself. If you show me just engine bar then I know when is the critical moment to think. For instance in one of the games I thought I have a winning attack and I sacrificed a pawn or two. Then my opponent accepted them and when I was about to launch my attack, he played spectacular move and destroyed my twitch whole plan (temporarily sacrificed a complete queen). Before I sacrifice my pawns I’ve calculated about 5-6 moves to be sure that this leads to a winning attack. The only thing I’ve missed was that queen sacrifice. In a normal game, normal human when sees such a heavy attack is coming, will not go after pawns, tries to strengthen the defensive resources or find a real counter play, unless they see with one queen sacrifice every advantage of opponent will be gone. Which is actually the last thing you might think. My opponent with 1000 bullet rating and 1300 tactic rating have foreseen all of them. That’s clear joke. I managed to win that game with a lot of material down (couple of pawns) but only on time. My opponent didn’t know how to convert it on time. I believe this guy was using engine bar not every single move was engine suggestion (maybe he was checking if his own move is good and in critical moment was using engine). These players are hardest to detect, if someone has rating above 2000 knows that when is up several pawns the best is to exchange all pieces and quickly win the endgame. It doesn’t need too precise moves unless you don’t trust yourself since you blunder too much and that means you shouldn’t be above 2000.
Additionally I’ve aborted two other games, and reported those players, their status was like: tactic 900, bullet 700, blitz 800, rapid 2100+! One of them was amazing, his rapid was 900 a year ago and then at one day he decided to win all his game and jumped to 2160.
I lost two games today, one of them was my own mistake that I pushed for a win in a drawish position but I pushed for win and lost (I didn’t accept multiple draw offers of my opponent). But the other loss of me was against a clear engine cheater, she had 52 wins and 2 losses, just imagine how high is that. I don’t know why chess.com doesn’t bann them for life time? If someone wants to practice and use engine assist and chess.com likes to tolerate them then they can go for correspondence game or maybe chess.com opens a new category (engine assist games) and make it live game, so that the other pools will be cleaner.
Normally at least upto 2300 I should win easily against my opponents but as you can see e.g. in games I played today, it is very hard to keep winning streak against that many cheaters.
Additionally I’ve aborted two other games, and reported those players, their status was like: tactic 900, bullet 700, blitz 800, rapid 2100+! One of them was amazing, his rapid was 900 a year ago and then at one day he decided to win all his game and jumped to 2160.
I lost two games today, one of them was my own mistake that I pushed for a win in a drawish position but I pushed for win and lost (I didn’t accept multiple draw offers of my opponent). But the other loss of me was against a clear engine cheater, she had 52 wins and 2 losses, just imagine how high is that. I don’t know why chess.com doesn’t bann them for life time? If someone wants to practice and use engine assist and chess.com likes to tolerate them then they can go for correspondence game or maybe chess.com opens a new category (engine assist games) and make it live game, so that the other pools will be cleaner.
Normally at least upto 2300 I should win easily against my opponents but as you can see e.g. in games I played today, it is very hard to keep winning streak against that many cheaters.
You have very likely played some cheaters, and ones with really steep or weird rating curves definitely are among the kinds you ought to be suspicious of. But to be honest, most of these don't sound like someone cheating at all, they sound like they played a relatively good game for them or they saw your threats, and then you either lost or won in time trouble. How would you like it if you played a good game, were proud of it, and someone reported you for cheating?
Chess.com publishes statistics each month about how many cheaters there were vs how many total players there were. There are cheaters, but even at a higher level like the one you are at, there just aren't 50%+ people cheating ever.
As always, I would like to caveat this with the statement that I have not played an abundance of 2100+ players and I do not have tangible evidence of the people you have played. Perhaps you have been inordinately unlucky. I am just speaking of the site-averaged data chess.com publishes, my personal experience, and other such various data points that do not definitely indict or exonerate those you have played against, just trend in a certain direction that leads me to some estimates. 
Hope you have a great day!
Jan 23, 2021
0
#71
Type all you want, you made the claim that "well over 50%" of people in rapid use engine assistance. Absolute nonsense. If you mean that above 2000, then maybe that number is less insane, but to think 50% of the pool is cheating is just completely delusional.
Jan 23, 2021
0
#72
nTzT wrote:
llama47 wrote:
"Rapid ratings are the real skill"
No, rapid ratings are where people barely know how the horsey moves.
Wait, who said rapid ratings are the real skill?
Your comments don't really make much sense anyways.
I was drunk and decided to try some unrated anonymous 10 minute games.
goldenbeer wrote:
I think blitz is the most important. Bullet has very little to do with chess, classic has no fan, rapid is the fist of engine assistant games, blitz is not as crazy as bullet and also there aren’t many players who cheat in blitz (maybe less than 20%, unlike in rapid where well over 50% are either just use engine assistance or use engine for all movea).
Those percentages are nonsense.
Jan 23, 2021
0
#74
llama47 wrote:
nTzT wrote:
llama47 wrote:
"Rapid ratings are the real skill"
No, rapid ratings are where people barely know how the horsey moves.
Wait, who said rapid ratings are the real skill?
Your comments don't really make much sense anyways.
I was drunk and decided to try some unrated anonymous 10 minute games.
Did someone actually say rapid ratings are the real skill or were you just that wasted
Who cares
Jan 23, 2021
0
#76
blueemu wrote:
Blitz players will tell you: "Blitz".
Rapid players will tell you: "Rapid"
Since I'm a Daily player, I'll tell you the truth: "Daily".
bullet is the main one because it is the only one I am above 2k in. That is the truth.
KieranPDevine wrote:
I've very recently been getting back into chess, what is considered the main rating on chess.com? Is it Blitz, Rapid? I've noticed rapid scores are noticeably higher than say blitz mode.
Blitz or Rapid are the most reliable ratings in my opinion.
Bullet has a lot to do with having good reactions, and Daily with how much time you are willing to invest.
Jan 23, 2021
0
#78
nTzT wrote:
llama47 wrote:
nTzT wrote:
llama47 wrote:
"Rapid ratings are the real skill"
No, rapid ratings are where people barely know how the horsey moves.
Wait, who said rapid ratings are the real skill?
Your comments don't really make much sense anyways.
I was drunk and decided to try some unrated anonymous 10 minute games.
Did someone actually say rapid ratings are the real skill or were you just that wasted
A guy (quoted below) said rapid is the main rating because other time controls are too fast to play well... yet when I tried random opponents it was the opposite. The 10 minute players had no idea what they were doing.
Jan 23, 2021
0
#79
wadesuess2 wrote:
I think it's rapid because you actually have enough time to think rather than blitz which is fairly fast.
I've very recently been getting back into chess, what is considered the main rating on chess.com? Is it Blitz, Rapid? I've noticed rapid scores are noticeably higher than say blitz mode.
There is no main rating. But if you wanted one, the rating you play the most
What would be considered the main evaluation of a good player? How can a gauge that?
You start by knowing what rating is good in a chess club!
Many players here have an USCF or a FIDE rating.
In those anyone under 1200 is a beginner;of course a 1200 has a lot more knowledge and experience then a 850 player.
So since you are way under 1200 you could maybe have this rating for your target for this year! or even a bit higher....
You need to know and to follow the opening principles and practice some tactics though!
If you get to 1250+ you will feel a very nice improvement!
Good luck!