What is your highest accuracy?

Sort:
rock303

Nope, I got like 25 accuracy against Ben playing all book moves

llama44
ChessGM10001 wrote:

yeah, wdym sus wins, i was playing fun games with my friend who is a cm

Yeah, I noticed.

llama44
FMLarry wrote:

I got an accuracy of 100 when I fools mated someone

I looked at all of your games. None of them were fools mate or 100%

Whir36
It wildly varies. I got 99% once but last game I got 34%
llama44

I got 99 in a daily game, but 15 moves were book, the only 2 moves I played on my own were inaccurate, and the rest was a tactical combination I worked out with the analysis board going through a ton of lines (so it doesn't really count)... so yeah, only 2 moves I played were inaccurate heh.

Account_Suspended

so u can rely on the book moves the computer provides in daily games? fascinating.

llama44

Heh, I recently had an opponent make the same mistake. He though the database was just computer moves.

There are databases of engine moves, but more usually they're a collection of human games. You use them to check what people have played in the past. This is how correspondence games have always been played, I mean like 100 years ago.

Correspondence style chess is supposed to be like research. Nothing like live chess.

And these days (not on chess.com) you can also use engines. You might wonder if everyone can use engines then what's the point? Well engines make mistakes unless you know how to use them (and add your human understanding).

eric0022
Yams_Smae wrote:

Have you ever got an accuracy between 95-100? What is your highest accuracy? Tell me in the comments and if you want, show the game too.

 

 

0.1

Yams_Smae

NO WAYYYYYYYYYYYY

BeastBoy06

99.8% on my other account

Teksuo

xqc got a 99.1 and he just started playin wink.png

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hed1hzb6w54

Account_Suspended

Which countries use the decimal point correctly when expressing a number that is not an integer and in using commas in expressing multiples of a thousand? Why is it the opposite in some places?

Account_Suspended

102.3 with a brilliance

jason543
toomtoom wrote:

102.3 with a brilliance

why are there so many liars here

rock303

He's trolling rart

robotmummy

I've got a bunch of them. But looking through the games, most of them are games where the opponent badly blunders or there is a long end game (I assume Stockfish gives you credit for chasing each other's pawns over the board for 40 moves).  I don't think any of them are my favorite games. 

 

rock303
BossPineapple wrote:

I got 99.6 with 2 brilliancies

Right.

nklristic

I had games in 95-100 % range, although I have to say it was analysed by depth 18 (as I have a free account), so the accuracy could be a bit different with higher depth.

Sometimes it is easy to have a high accuracy when the position is simple enough and you have some obvious trades.

I think this is my game with highest accuracy:

https://www.chess.com/live/game/4852314981

It says 99.6%, although it was only 7 moves because my opponent blundered and resigned quickly. 

Apart from that, I had some simplified games with a lot of trades and a draw in the end where both players were around 95 or 96% (and 18 depth when analyzing).

 

And to mention, I mostly play 1 hour games, and still have very bad games apart from high accuracy ones. happy.png

jason543

if you want brilliant moves just play rook endgames i saw a game where there were 3 brilliant moves. they were all just simple drawing moves in a rook endgame

astroawe3

99.99