What The Hell

Sort:
Avatar of Jay_Plays

Yesterday I Reached `1750 In Chess.com Puzzles And Today I Reached 1900!! What The Heck I Gained 384 Points Of Puzzles

Avatar of Chris_E_S3

Very impressive Jay.... I'm "stuck" near 1600

Avatar of Jay_Plays

i tilted

 

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
Jay_Plays wrote:

Yesterday I Reached `1750 In Chess.com Puzzles And Today I Reached 1900!! What The Heck I Gained 384 Points Of Puzzles

 

I had the opposite problem .... I lost 500 points over 9 days, in multiple sessions, and have worked my way back up some

Avatar of sanpatkan

Congratulations Jay. Keep it up.

Avatar of PerpetualPatzer123

Nice curse in the title. Tone it down a bit.

Avatar of Jay_Plays
Martin_Stahl wrote:
Jay_Plays wrote:

Yesterday I Reached `1750 In Chess.com Puzzles And Today I Reached 1900!! What The Heck I Gained 384 Points Of Puzzles

 

I had the opposite problem .... I lost 500 points over 9 days, in multiple sessions, and have worked my way back up some

umm try the best

Avatar of FifthKaZoo

wink.png

Avatar of albacored
Martin_Stahl wrote:
Jay_Plays wrote:

Yesterday I Reached `1750 In Chess.com Puzzles And Today I Reached 1900!! What The Heck I Gained 384 Points Of Puzzles

 

I had the opposite problem .... I lost 500 points over 9 days, in multiple sessions, and have worked my way back up some

For me, the design of the puzzle system could be improved a lot. Say in an example, there's 15 points assigned to a puzzle. To get +15 points, you have to do the puzzle under the target time. If you get the first move wrong, you get -15 points. Due to this, it's easy to lose hundreds of points on relatively few puzzles. Clawing these points back is slow if you only get 70% of the target time. A fairer system for me would to not penalise people so much for getting the puzzle wrong. Only the equivalent for doing the puzzle correctly, but slowly. I.e., +/- 5 points. Can still reward people for doing the puzzles super quickly, with an extra 10 points. How many people are really getting under the target time? I have no idea how those are set. Personally I have to spend several minutes per puzzle usually.

Avatar of donfoxyes
AunTheKnight wrote:

Nice curse in the title. Tone it down a bit.

Wow, I haven't seen an overreaction like that since my parents confiscated my copy of the Eagles' Hotel California album, just because in the song "Life in the Fast Lane" they use the word "goddamn". Destructive, filthy-mouthed, troublemaking punks, those Eagles.

Avatar of Jay_Plays

2000!!

Avatar of Dmitry_123456789

Congratulations, Jay! Continue your assault on the summit!gold.png

Avatar of PerpetualPatzer123
donfox2017 wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:

Nice curse in the title. Tone it down a bit.

Wow, I haven't seen an overreaction like that since my parents confiscated my copy of the Eagles' Hotel California album, just because in the song "Life in the Fast Lane" they use the word "goddamn". Destructive, filthy-mouthed, troublemaking punks, those Eagles.

I haven’t seen someone not get a joke as simple as that in quite a while.

Avatar of PerpetualPatzer123

Anyway, congrats on 2000 puzzles!

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
albacored wrote:

For me, the design of the puzzle system could be improved a lot. Say in an example, there's 15 points assigned to a puzzle. To get +15 points, you have to do the puzzle under the target time. If you get the first move wrong, you get -15 points. Due to this, it's easy to lose hundreds of points on relatively few puzzles. Clawing these points back is slow if you only get 70% of the target time. A fairer system for me would to not penalise people so much for getting the puzzle wrong. Only the equivalent for doing the puzzle correctly, but slowly. I.e., +/- 5 points. Can still reward people for doing the puzzles super quickly, with an extra 10 points. How many people are really getting under the target time? I have no idea how those are set. Personally I have to spend several minutes per puzzle usually.

 

Target times are based on others solving the puzzles and change over time. I'm not sure losing less points on a failure is a good idea; puzzles are already really inflated, compared to other playing pools (with all the caveats of comparisons across pools). Can't image how much more inflated they'd get by decreasing losses.

Avatar of Jay_Plays

Martin can you tell me about the chess.com rules?

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
Jay_Plays wrote:

Martin can you tell me about the chess.com rules?

 

There used to be a good support article on the tactics system, but over the years it has changed to not provide as many details. As far as I'm aware, the system works essentially the same way as it always has, just the underlying way tactics scoring works has been tweaked.

Avatar of sndeww

it's not that hard to grind puzzles lol

Avatar of Suvit-Angirash
Jay_Plays wrote:

Yesterday I Reached `1750 In Chess.com Puzzles And Today I Reached 1900!! What The Heck I Gained 384 = 150! Points Of Puzzles

Didn't you get 150 points cus 1750 + 50 = 1800 + 100 = 1900 and 100 + 50 = 150 / 50 + 100 = 150

Avatar of Jay_Plays

250