*Trying not to make a joke*
you could take advantage of it too, though. For example you may see your opponent play a somewhat bad move and fail to punish it. Later you see that the move is actually fine.
Generally, though, you should have more best moves than other moves (excellent, good)
*Trying not to make a joke*
you could take advantage of it too, though. For example you may see your opponent play a somewhat bad move and fail to punish it. Later you see that the move is actually fine.
Generally, though, you should have more best moves than other moves (excellent, good)
I'm reading this right after I posted this and I have no clue what I wanted to say
*Trying not to make a joke*
you could take advantage of it too, though. For example you may see your opponent play a somewhat bad move and fail to punish it. Later you see that the move is actually fine.
Generally, though, you should have more best moves than other moves (excellent, good)
They could rename them. Instead of: best - excellent - good
It could be: good - acceptable - disappointing
*Trying not to make a joke*
you could take advantage of it too, though. For example you may see your opponent play a somewhat bad move and fail to punish it. Later you see that the move is actually fine.
Generally, though, you should have more best moves than other moves (excellent, good)
I'm reading this right after I posted this and I have no clue what I wanted to say
lmao
*Trying not to make a joke*
you could take advantage of it too, though. For example you may see your opponent play a somewhat bad move and fail to punish it. Later you see that the move is actually fine.
Generally, though, you should have more best moves than other moves (excellent, good)
They could rename them. Instead of: best - excellent - good
It could be: good - acceptable - disappointing
or best - good - acceptable/decent? I get more of the disappointing vibe from inaccuracy but that's just me
and any of my irl friends can tell you that my social life is more dead than a doorknob
*Trying not to make a joke*
you could take advantage of it too, though. For example you may see your opponent play a somewhat bad move and fail to punish it. Later you see that the move is actually fine.
Generally, though, you should have more best moves than other moves (excellent, good)
Lasker: if you seee a good move try to play a better move
*Trying not to make a joke*
you could take advantage of it too, though. For example you may see your opponent play a somewhat bad move and fail to punish it. Later you see that the move is actually fine.
Generally, though, you should have more best moves than other moves (excellent, good)
Lasker: if you seee a good move try to play a better move
if you see a good move play it, regret it, but win on time anyways
- online chess postulate #3
*Trying not to make a joke*
you could take advantage of it too, though. For example you may see your opponent play a somewhat bad move and fail to punish it. Later you see that the move is actually fine.
Generally, though, you should have more best moves than other moves (excellent, good)
Lasker: if you seee a good move try to play a better move
if you see a good move play it, regret it, but win on time anyways
- online chess postulate #3
However in otb I play better If i face a low rated I start to troll him by promoting 3 queens poking fun of him
Whose game is it? I think the ratings matter when it determines the accuracy
Whose game is it? I think the ratings matter when it determines the accuracy
ratings don't affect accuracy
Since the new system, they do. A mistake at one level might not be listed as one on another.
Whose game is it? I think the ratings matter when it determines the accuracy
nobodys
Check out this game report, no mistakes, no blunders, only a few inaccuracies. ~95% accuracy for both players. Pretty good right?
-
-
Now let's look at the actual game
-
-
It's just a bunch of stupid moves where on move 25 everything is on the back rank for both players.
If both you and your opponent play a dull game with few tactics, then it's possible to get a high "accuracy" score even if you both played badly.
What new players should know, is that if you're new, this tool will help you find tactical blunders quickly... but that's all it's good for. Yes strategic errors will make the eval bar drop too, but the risk for new players is that it will criticize you for not playing some deep idea (like you would have been just in time to prevent the d5 break if you'd played a 5 move sequence), while ignoring the fact that you played like a total idiot overall (as in the game above).
Especially for beginners, approaching a position with good concepts, and good habits, will help cure a lot of bad moves by eliminating them from consideration completely. This analysis tool can't tell you that your entire mindset or habits are wrong.
---
Anyway, I had the idea for this topic after reading yet another "I'm a 1000 rated player who plays 30 second chess, check out my game where I got >90% accuracy, why was my accuracy so high?"