LOL ok karl maybe we can call it a draw
What would you do?

The point you are missing is that it may not be enjoyable for the stronger player. There is no real risk for them; nothing is at stake; the outcome is inevitable.
If they gave you a head start (of a minor piece, say), they would then face the very real prospect of losing to you but ... (and I agree with you on this point), it would not count as a game of chess.

The point you are missing is that it may not be enjoyable for the stronger player. There is no real risk for them; nothing is at stake; the outcome is inevitable.
If they gave you a head start (of a minor piece, say), they would then face the very real prospect of losing to you but ... (and I agree with you on this point), it would not count as a game of chess.
True enough on part of stronger player. Assuming he plays at equal strength. As a coaching tool it may be of use. But again they can play unrated. And if it doesnt count why give up the piece to coach?? I just can't get on board with handicaps
My point stands: virtually every activity is stratified by ability. It's not much fun for beginners to play experts - and even less fun for experts to play beginners - UNLESS the playing field has been levelled.
Good point. I've always wanted some kind of handicap system here. Like the strong player starting without a piece. Perhaps a site feature suggestion? Unrated, handicapped games? In both Live and Online games would be a nice option. People do it OTB all the time. :)
Karl this time I have to disagree with you!!! To date you have won what 10 games in a row against me and I have enjoyed all. Each has helped me get better. The idea of a handicap makes me ill. If you are gonna compete than compete!! And stop pussifing everything.