"in what situations (especially with a FEN/PGN) you believe the correct plan would dictate queenside play? " ++ When the pawn configuration dictates so. Here is a PGN: 9 b4!
https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1070932
"what the point of a queenside play might even be"
++ To weaken and then win a pawn and then queen it.
Can someone articulate in simple terms in what situations (especially with a FEN/PGN) you believe the correct plan would dictate queenside play? I think it'd be great to hear a range of different explanations from people at the different rating levels, and we can all compare and contrast our perspectives from each other.
Many people understand when to attack on the kingside or play in the centre. An area that seems to be particularly ambiguous for many is what heuristics to look out for, when, and what the point of a queenside play might even be, when there is neither king is on the queenside.
Minority attack is an example that comes to mind, but that's not necessarily to do with it being on the queenside. What are some typical stock plans and motifs to look out for, that dictate queenside play would be optimal? A collection of these would be great study material for all.