coneheadzombie: Your comment gave me a thought. With one of my opponents that fell in the camp - "won't resign even though I'm utterly lost with no chance of stalemate", I saw how I could get his king into a corner where it oscillates between two squares, play conditional moves that culminates in my having four queens before delivering the final coup de grace while watching him squirm - or am I childish?
That is a very good way to deal with people who won't resign - punish them. It's not cruel, it's just chess.
no! it's not the chess that does it (though many will agree with you to blow a smokescreen!)
just to set the record straight - when I played my opponent who kept playing on even when his position was hopelessly lost, I did put aside any irritation I might have had given what I would have done in his position and played quite correctly, playing timely moves (ok, I did more conditional moves than normal in the hope of speeding things up) and winning in the most efficient way I could find. That's it I suppose - it takes all sorts but for me doing things right is important.