It is all relative, of course. To an expert player, I am bad, to a super GM, I might as well not know how the pieces move, to a friend who hasn't played chess, I'm some kind of wizard
When your good
En Passant? Are you kidding? I knew that move when I started playing chess, at about 8 years old!
Just knowing "the moves" doesn't make you a good chess player, it only means you can maybe play a game.

It's funny, because when I was about 1600 rated, I'd have considered myself quite good at chess. I'm now rated much higher and would hesitate to say I'm decent, let alone good.
The more I learn about chess, the more I realize I know so little.

En Passant? Are you kidding? I knew that move when I started playing chess, at about 8 years old!
Just knowing "the moves" doesn't make you a good chess player, it only means you can maybe play a game.

It's funny, because when I was about 1600 rated, I'd have considered myself quite good at chess. I'm now rated much higher and would hesitate to say I'm decent, let alone good.
The more I learn about chess, the more I realize I know so little.

It's funny, because when I was about 1600 rated, I'd have considered myself quite good at chess. I'm now rated much higher and would hesitate to say I'm decent, let alone good.
The more I learn about chess, the more I realize I know so little.
Totally agree
It's about when you hit 2000-2100 that you start realising how totally crap you are at the game.
And it gets exponentially worse after that.
I can't play for ****.
What is the milestone one should reach in order to say with confidence "I am good at chess"? There are probably as many answers as there are players, but how about these:
Your ideas?