The bishop, I try a fork and it comes out of nowhere and takes my knight
Which chess piece do you think is the strongest (after the queen)?
Dumb thread, obviously the rooooooooookkkk!! 300 elo question!
bruh do you even know how old this thread is?
Since the creator was 300 elo?
probably.
How she only at 700 elo? Must be because she's just been using chess.com as social media!
dude can you like srsly shut up?

Dumb thread, obviously the rooooooooookkkk!! 300 elo question!
bruh do you even know how old this thread is?
Since the creator was 300 elo?
probably.
How she only at 700 elo? Must be because she's just been using chess.com as social media!
why do you always need to comment on people's elo? And how many times should we make you understand that many people play just for fun and in their leisure time, they do not care about rating and stuff.
also @ehm42 I was wondering how come you have 18,000+ points? You seem to use this more as "social media" than her?
Meiner Meinung nach der Turm. Es ist meiner Meinung nach eins der wichtigsten Figuren, da mit dem Turm die meisten Endspiele ausgetragen werfen.


i think the bishops beacuse the occupied all the diagonals and they can be very annoying for the opponent to deal with

The valuation of the pieces speak for themselves, but I would argue that the knight is the most dangerous piece after the queen in low elo chess (<1100/1200). It's much harder to see their movement patterns. A rook is powerful, but much easier to understand and therefore easier to defend against (or use). Same for a bishop. But a knight, that can hop around all over the place, making it very difficult to attack as a defender, because it's difficult to spot its next move. Making it also a psychologically difficult piece to play against, and powerful to play with. Again, this is low elo chess. I think anything 1100-1200 plus it is just the rook.
Dumb thread, obviously the rooooooooookkkk!! 300 elo question!
bruh do you even know how old this thread is?
Since the creator was 300 elo?
probably.