Forums

who has played the most number of bullet games on chess.com?

Sort:
saurav2202

I joined here in april last year and within 6 months i had played 20000 bullet games(and this does include  single 10 second game,mostly 1/0 and 2/1). Though i have not been playing bullet since March this year but i wish to at least break the record for most bullet games played. So has anyone got a rough idea who has played the most bullet games and around how much? 

notmtwain
saurav2202 wrote:

I joined here in april last year and within 6 months i had played 20000 bullet games(and this does include  single 10 second game,mostly 1/0 and 2/1). Though i have not been playing bullet since March this year but i wish to at least break the record for most bullet games played. So has anyone got a rough idea who has played the most bullet games and around how much? 

Your 20,000 is only 200,000 short of the record a year ago.

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/most-games-played

notmtwain

2017 stats has a new leader. With 250,336 games, the ostensibly human bullet leader is PeaceMyFriend.

Better get busy...

Fischzauber

So what's the attraction of bullet chess? I don't get it. There's no time to think, to plan, even to look properly at what's going on on the board. Compared to bullet chess, even 10 minute blitz games with no increment count as proper chess as far as I'm concerned. Okay, Nakamura may not agree, but how many of us have his powers of lighting fast calculation? I wonder whether people who only play bullet chess don't want to make the mental effort that real chess demands. This isn't meant as a criticism, it's just that I can't see the point of playing a game as complex and beautiful as chess at such absurdly fast speeds.

kinglysac

lol bullet is just about premoving and troll-checking

David

1|0 is my preferred time control  

There's actually a lot of variation within bullet: 2|1 is practically the same as 3|0 blitz, whereas 10s|0 is definitely about ridiculous premoves. 30s|0 also degenerates pretty quickly into a time scramble, which is why I think Chess.com is considering making sub 1|0 games a separate rating category ("Hyperbullet" or something like that) - I find 1|0 gives me just enough time to belt out the opening and then get into a reasonable mid to end game.

To be honest, I find myself getting bored in even a 5 minute game. I do like Daily Chess, though.

saurav2202

@notwtmain So we conclude peacemyfriend is the leader here  . just for a matter of fact i have a 7-6 record against him. really it sounds  amazing how he played this many games.

saurav2202

@Fischzauber there are many times when you dont feel like thinking much and then you prefer for bullet and it is not as such that we dont get time to think. i have seen only kings on the board even in 1 minute games. many people prefer bulets over rapid just because o our busy lives. i hardly got time from my tutions and school.

saurav2202
Caedrel wrote:

1|0 is my preferred time control  

There's actually a lot of variation within bullet: 2|1 is practically the same as 3|0 blitz, whereas 10s|0 is definitely about ridiculous premoves. 30s|0 also degenerates pretty quickly into a time scramble, which is why I think Chess.com is considering making sub 1|0 games a separate rating category ("Hyperbullet" or something like that) - I find 1|0 gives me just enough time to belt out the opening and then get into a reasonable mid to end game.

To be honest, I find myself getting bored in even a 5 minute game. I do like Daily Chess, though.

Yeah just the same with me too. and bullet tournaments are so challenging we get to play many higher rated ones and some times or other i have been able to make some big upsets.

Fischzauber

Okay guys, thank you for offering me an alternative point of view.

AussieMatey

saurav, if you increase your rate to about 140 Bullet games a day, you'll catch up to PeaceMyFriend in about 57 years.

notmtwain

Argentinoxxo must be a shark. Look at his 65% wins percentage and the 894 rating.

 Now down to 624. With a peak rating of 2287.

Can there be a purpose?

null

notmtwain

null

stewardjandstewardj

Please@notmtwain be relevant, helpful & nice!

what is the link for this pic?

stewardjandstewardj

woah, how did I do that?

well, anyways, what is the link to the above pic?

notmtwain

stewardjandstewardj wrote:

woah, how did I do that?

well, anyways, what is the link to the above pic?

V2 had a View Players capacity to make lists like the above.

https://www.chess.com/livechess/players

stewardjandstewardj

good thing I am using V2, lol

stewardjandstewardj

where can I find it?

notmtwain

stewardjandstewardj wrote:

where can I find it?

https://www.chess.com/livechess/players?type=Bullet&sortby=total_game_count

stewardjandstewardj

wow, nice. I just learned that I win 49% of games wen I am white in every chess type, and 47% of games when I'm black.