irahranchad wrote:
White ?? (-1.10 to -10.1) ... Black ?? (-10.1 to -1.10) !!! What a comedy show.
Exactly! Who is the master here !? I had -10.1 and I WON the game !
Show me oe of your games where you had -10.1 agaisnt A class player at least, in a standard-rapid time controls. SHOW ME!
Until that shut you m-th !
Daring me for a game , eh? I'll poop your head off!
My rate is over 2000.See some of my games and learn how to attack.
My orginal rating , 2265
irahranchad wrote:
My rate is over 2000.See some of my games and learn how to attack.
My orginal rating , 2265
Oh so you want to compare now? Lol
Compare your highest rating and your best win rating with mine then. I think it's obvious.
#28
Oh yeah and 2265 is in your dreams? lmao
#4
#11
#13
I LIKE how this people not even 1400 rating (class C) players yet , they think game is an absolute garbage agaisnt 1922rating-2093rating players.
Let me ask you one question then, if you think my opponent is so ooooooooooo easy and I play worser then a begginer , then why the F are you stuck on your 13 hundreds and can't reach 2000yet? It's so ooooooooooo easy, why can't you do it then after so many games have been played!?
lol well that 1900 you played hadn't reached 2000 yet...would you care to explain how you were getting completely destroyed in the middlegame? And btw my rating doesn't give me any more qualification to criticize you than those 1300s and 1400s. There's no need to be rude.
And if you really want to compare so bad, I can post my games against GMs if you'd like.
Why so serious, the OP is only having some little fun. Why must he hide his love away?
CheesyPuns wrote:
Looked at your game and :
Very nice, very nice 👏
RESPECT
Well , lets stop talking trash and concentrate about your game.
Mike_Aronchuk wrote:
Well , lets stop talking trash and concentrate about your game.
Now we are talking 👌
Thanks for posting your game!
I would like to know what was the consideration behind the Bxh4?? move- was it clear to you that your attack was strong enough to cause your opponent to return material later on? or was it for positional advantage?
adamyevzory wrote:
Thanks for posting your game!
I would like to know what was the consideration behind the Bxh4?? move- was it clear to you that your attack was strong enough to cause your opponent to return material later on? or was it for positional advantage?
Hi .
Well that's a good question to ask and you are right it was critical point in my game, where I had to make a decision how the game would go passive.positional and sturdy OR sharp, risky, highly tactical.
I guess it depends on the mood you are in.
On move 12 I was loosing a pawn no matter what I do , so I had not much of a choice there if I continue play passively, positional I would probably loose dues to disadvantage in material, so my only choice was ALL IN, use it or loose it !
Shake things up to avoid a slow positional grind!
-I bet that this move made your opponent feel good at first (haha)
adamyevzory wrote:
Shake things up to avoid a slow positional grind!
-I bet that this move made your opponent feel good at first (haha)
Exactly !
"Feel good at first" I don't know about feeling good, I mean it was kind of dangerous for him 2 pawns passing plus queen . It was quite dangerous for him and I think he was scared a little, but I think just a little he thought everything was under control with plenty of time.
irahranchad wrote:
White ?? (-1.10 to -10.1) ... Black ?? (-10.1 to -1.10) !!! What a comedy show.
Exactly! Who is the master here !? I had -10.1 and I WON the game !
Show me oe of your games where you had -10.1 agaisnt A class player at least, in a standard-rapid time controls. SHOW ME!
Until that shut you m-th !