adamyevzory wrote:
Thanks for posting your game!
I would like to know what was the consideration behind the Bxh4?? move- was it clear to you that your attack was strong enough to cause your opponent to return material later on? or was it for positional advantage?
Hi .
Well that's a good question to ask and you are right it was critical point in my game, where I had to make a decision how the game would go passive.positional and sturdy OR sharp, risky, highly tactical.
I guess it depends on the mood you are in.
On move 12 I was loosing a pawn no matter what I do , so I had not much of a choice there if I continue play passively, positional I would probably loose dues to disadvantage in material, so my only choice was ALL IN, use it or loose it !
Thanks for posting your game!
I would like to know what was the consideration behind the Bxh4?? move- was it clear to you that your attack was strong enough to cause your opponent to return material later on? or was it for positional advantage?