Who wants to see highly tactical game by me !?

adamyevzory

Thanks for posting your game!

I would like to know what was the consideration behind the Bxh4?? move- was it clear to you that your attack was strong enough to cause your opponent to return material later on? or was it for positional advantage?

 

 
ESP-918

adamyevzory wrote:

Thanks for posting your game!

I would like to know what was the consideration behind the Bxh4?? move- was it clear to you that your attack was strong enough to cause your opponent to return material later on? or was it for positional advantage?

 

 

Hi .

Well that's a good question to ask and you are right it was critical point in my game, where I had to make a decision how the game would go passive.positional and sturdy OR sharp, risky, highly tactical.

I guess it depends on the mood you are in.

On move 12 I was loosing a pawn no matter what I do , so I had not much of a choice there if I continue play passively, positional I would probably loose dues to disadvantage in material, so my only choice was ALL IN, use it or loose it !

adamyevzory

Shake things up to avoid a slow positional grind! 

-I bet that this move made your opponent feel good at first (haha)

ESP-918

adamyevzory wrote:

Shake things up to avoid a slow positional grind! 

-I bet that this move made your opponent feel good at first (haha)

Exactly !

"Feel good at first" I don't know about feeling good, I mean it was kind of dangerous for him 2 pawns passing plus queen . It was quite dangerous for him and I think he was scared a little, but I think just a little he thought everything was under control with plenty of time.