x
Chess - Play & Learn

Chess.com

FREE - In Google Play

FREE - in Win Phone Store

VIEW

Who wants to see highly tactical game by me !?

  • #41
    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • #42

    Thanks for posting your game!

    I would like to know what was the consideration behind the Bxh4?? move- was it clear to you that your attack was strong enough to cause your opponent to return material later on? or was it for positional advantage?

     

     
  • #43

    adamyevzory wrote:

    Thanks for posting your game!

    I would like to know what was the consideration behind the Bxh4?? move- was it clear to you that your attack was strong enough to cause your opponent to return material later on? or was it for positional advantage?

     

     

    Hi .

    Well that's a good question to ask and you are right it was critical point in my game, where I had to make a decision how the game would go passive.positional and sturdy OR sharp, risky, highly tactical.

    I guess it depends on the mood you are in.

    On move 12 I was loosing a pawn no matter what I do , so I had not much of a choice there if I continue play passively, positional I would probably loose dues to disadvantage in material, so my only choice was ALL IN, use it or loose it !

  • #44

    Shake things up to avoid a slow positional grind! 

    -I bet that this move made your opponent feel good at first (haha)

  • #45

    adamyevzory wrote:

    Shake things up to avoid a slow positional grind! 

    -I bet that this move made your opponent feel good at first (haha)

    Exactly !

    "Feel good at first" I don't know about feeling good, I mean it was kind of dangerous for him 2 pawns passing plus queen . It was quite dangerous for him and I think he was scared a little, but I think just a little he thought everything was under control with plenty of time.

Top

Online Now