rating mean nothing it just let you know how well you play.
Why are half the players on this site a chicken?
Sort:
Nov 26, 2011
0
#23
nobel32 wrote:
U R ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY INCORRECT. U LOSE MORE RATING TO A LOWER RATING THAN VICE VERSA.... CONCERNED... U KNOW
You lose less often to lower rated players, so it should even out.
Half of the players on this site form one chicken? That's interesting. How large can this chicken become?
Nov 26, 2011
0
#25
browni3141 wrote:
nobel32 wrote:
U R ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY INCORRECT. U LOSE MORE RATING TO A LOWER RATING THAN VICE VERSA.... CONCERNED... U KNOW
You should lose less often to lower rated players, so it should even out.
there, fixed.
to get to the other side.
CBA wrote:
Why did the pervert cross the road?
To chat up the chicken?
1 chicken = 3,205,357 people(/dummy accounts).
Jan 11, 2013
0
#29
mrguy888 wrote:
froghollow wrote:
I still ponder over the $64 question , did the chicken or the egg come 1st ? Or is it a case of who"s on 1st .
Dinosaurs were laying eggs long before chickens were around. Eggs came first.
Are you saying that a dinosaur laid the first egg that a chicken came out of?
Talk about disappointed parents!
hessmaster wrote:
Which came first, the chicken or the egg that hatched the chicken?
Is it correct to ask about theism on this site?
Jan 11, 2013
0
#31
DrSpudnik wrote:
mrguy888 wrote:
froghollow wrote:
I still ponder over the $64 question , did the chicken or the egg come 1st ? Or is it a case of who"s on 1st .
Dinosaurs were laying eggs long before chickens were around. Eggs came first.
Are you saying that a dinosaur laid the first egg that a chicken came out of?
Talk about disappointed parents!
Actually this is a very interesting question. Most people think its just a joke and they laugh and move on to the next joke. I, on the other hand, being the serious person that I am and having become interested in dinosaurs since I first saw dinosaur skeletons in the Museum of Natural History as a child, have looked deeply into this question. Scientists are now saying that birds and dinosaurs are closely related. In fact, current theory says that dinosaurs never became extinct, they merely evolved into birds. While DNA from dinosaurs have never been recovered they have broken open dinosaur bones and analyzed the contents and they have discovered that tyrannosaurus rex, the great thunder lizard had the same calcium compound in its bones that modern chickens have in theirs, this type of calcium being used by their bodies to create the egg shells. No other animal except the chicken and the tyrannosaurus has this type of calcium in the bones. It is well known that large animals sometimes evolve into smaller versions under certain circumstances, so it is probablle that the mighty thunder lizard and the barnyard chicken are closely related! So maybe when you call someone "chicken" its not so much of an insult after all!
Jan 11, 2013
0
#32
LordHarnois wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
Which came first, the chicken or the egg that hatched the chicken?
Is it correct to ask about theism on this site?
Maybe if you are in the Atheists and Theists group forums.
Not in the general forums, though.
PANCAKES!!! With chicken, of course.
skullskullskull wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
But how does a chicken and an egg relate to religion???????
Pray for an answer.
I would answer this question, but it would lock up the thread.
On second thought, maybe thats not such a bad idea...
hessmaster wrote:
corrijean wrote:
LordHarnois wrote:
hessmaster wrote:
Which came first, the chicken or the egg that hatched the chicken?
Is it correct to ask about theism on this site?
Maybe if you are in the Atheists and Theists group forums.
Not in the general forums, though.
But how does a chicken and an egg relate to religion???????
If chicken first creationism if egg first evolution
U R ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY INCORRECT. U LOSE MORE RATING TO A LOWER RATING THAN VICE VERSA.... CONCERNED... U KNOW