Why are there separate titles for women?

Sort:
Avatar of Shrimpguy
Mikeyjc3 wrote:

Because maybe 5 or 6 women would get titles every 50 years or so.

 

Why dont women compete with men in the Olympics?

 

Because they would also lose and never get medals


So, you're saying women have as big cognitive disadvantage as muscular when competing vs men???

Avatar of sndeww
glow_squid wrote:

lol women

💀💀💀

Avatar of ChessProKing-TM

IDK why they have separate titles

 

Avatar of duntcare
ZachGB wrote:

because they are female

 

you had to necropost didnt you

Avatar of WowThisIsWeird

Idk, it's probably because women don't play chess as much as men, so it might be to make getting a title easier for them, to motivate them.

But in no way are women worse. the reason most grandmasters are male is because most chess players are male.

I mean Judit Polgar beat carlsen and kasparov lol

Avatar of cokezerochess22

Seems like a nekrod clickbait troll thread but the real answer is simple.  The idea is to incentivize more woman to play chess. Yes its really that simple and while I'm sure plenty disagree there is your answer.

Avatar of MrSaysYes

bro is it just me or is this whole "arguement" just : Men > Women







Well not that i disagree

Avatar of Jalex13
Depends on who “bro” is.
Avatar of wakuvvaku

In starcraft 2 Korean pro players cannot participate in some but not all foreign tournaments but the foreign players can play in korean league if they want to. I think the idea is the same, to encourage more to play from the historically weaker player base.

Avatar of CoJames0

Because there would be 11 women with the "GM" title, it's like in the Olympics there is also separation because of gender. Men can analyze and can think analytically better. It's just not fair.

Avatar of WowThisIsWeird

"men can analyze and can think analytically better"

ayo no need to be sexist. in the olympics, there is a separation because men are usually physically stronger than women, as they are larger and have more muscle (usually).

But in chess, there is nothing physical. There is no proof, and no reason to think that men are better than women at chess. Look at Judit Polgar for instance. She's a GM! She beat 11 world champions! 

Find me some reason to believe that men are better at chess, for instance, a research paper with sources. Then I'll think it a possibility.

Avatar of Omed

because women are weaker

Avatar of WowThisIsWeird

bruh what? that is the dumbest thing i've ever heard on the site.

so Judit Polgar is "weak"? Aka, the person who beat 11 world champions is "weak"?

Avatar of cheese_the_god

Why do women get titles with lower ratings? women are just as good as men mentally, what is going on?