When it comes to Poker you are clueless PF. Any such match has NOT been organized and if one is, it is but a single match. Dozens of matches would provide little data. Professionals are not going to put up their own money and play in such. If played with house money ,the betting would be altered. Poker depends on the cards dealt. It's not like chess in which the same position is dealt every time at the start. I played pro for years and it's not just any opinion. You say TH is just TH. Again you are entirely wrong. Ring games, tournaments. heads up play all present different challenges that require totally different strategies. A program that is effective in heads up play would be quite useless at a table of 10 human players in a tournament format.
I didn't say the strategies were the same nor that a non-heads up match had been organized, I'm merely telling you that a match could be organized just like it has been previously (twice or more in fact), those matches had 4 professional players including Doug who stated that he believed computers would eventually become better than poker players.
"We already know bots beat the best players in poker" was your statement. That was the entirety of your claim. I lent clarification, pointing out only in a heads up format has a poker program beaten a very few professional poker players in a ONE time match - which was dependent on the cards dealt as a major variable.
It was a good clarification, you were wrong in stating I was wrong though.