You play a game with 75 moves like professional Chess Master whit 95% of precision. Is very suspicious for your raiting
I AM U-571 DELETE ME
Sort:
quierom wrote:
You play a game with 75 moves like professional Chess Master whit 95% of precision. Is very suspicious for your raiting
Flattering. Surely I would have won after having a 4 pt advantage in an opening I know very well and went on with my life rather than ousting myself on the boards.
95% in 75 moves :facepalm
quierom wrote:
95% in 75 moves :facepalm
92.7 with many meaningless rook moves in the end game. You don't even play rapid and haven't looked at the game so what would you know.
quierom wrote:
95% in 75 moves :facepalm
...not how accuracy works, kramnik
Chess.com's accuracy calculation drastically increases if you have a huge advantage the entire game. because when you're up a lot of material, there's really few bad moves, so every move is classified as a best or excellent move.
Another example is 98% in a 90 move game I had, cheating, right? No. It was a dry rook endgame after we traded every piece except rooks. Since the eval was always at 0.0, every move was the "best move"
You don't calculate cheating by pure CAPs,you have to understand the complexity and "only" moves being done.
Hikaranukumara wrote:
I very recently played against someone with a history of playing against an account that fed him elo for about 12 games before being banned. He turned on an engine or opened some sort analysis board after falling behind in the open. As a paying customer of chesscom, I would like to know why I'm the subject of cheaters who waste my time with significant evidence of abuse in their account history.
But I don't think this is the right tone to address the problem. It's more beneficial for chess.com to be 100% of cheating instead of 95%. If false banning was just a little bit more common, its hard to differentiate the false-bans and the real bannings, overloading the appeal system. Cheating detection is complicated.
Mar 3, 2024
0
#8
Rating manipulation like the one you describe is an easy fair play violation, but maybe they got a warning about it rather than a closure. Report the game you played and Chess.com will review and take appropriate action. 3% of games get actioned for fair play violations, so it's not like it's rampant.
Having said that, cheating can't be discussed in the public forums because it inevitably leads to naming & shaming and all sorts of dumb accusations, so this thread is going to get locked by a moderator.
David wrote:
Rating manipulation like the one you describe is an easy fair play violation, but maybe they got a warning about it rather than a closure. Report the game you played and Chess.com will review and take appropriate action. 3% of games get actioned for fair play violations, so it's not like it's rampant.
Having said that, cheating can't be discussed in the public forums because it inevitably leads to naming & shaming and all sorts of dumb accusations, so this thread is going to get locked by a moderator.
Actually just wanted to delete it already cuz I'm ready to move on. Maybe I was even wrong and I just threw a game! Felt pretty sus is all. It doesn't allow to delete forum threads for some reason.
EDIT: [Censoring my own post cuz talking about cheating players isn't allowed and neither is deleting a forum post]