Why is Nakamura not playing the US Championship?

Sort:
Pan_troglodites

At https://youtu.be/Y5Su4TQ-IlU

we can see he playing with his stepfather. 

I like to play like his stepfather, speaking loud and making things for fun:-)

Pan_troglodites

At chess.com we can see a list of players.

https://www.chess.com/article/view/us-chess-championships#players

Hiraku is not listed.

List of Players
U.S. #1 GM Fabiano Caruana
U.S. #2 GM Wesley So
U.S. #3 GM Leinier Dominguez
U.S. #5 GM Sam Shankland
U.S. #6 GM Jeffery Xiong
U.S. #7 GM Ray Robson
U.S. #9 GM Sam Sevian
U.S. #10 GM Dariusz Swiercz
U.S. #11 GM Lazaro Bruzon
U.S. #13 GM Daniel Naroditsky
U.S. #18 GM Alex Lenderman
U.S. #28 GM John Burke

But the question is why he is not playing...

According to many replies from forum from the site above linked,
Hiraku Nakamura   is listed  in the Grand Swiss 2021 Tournment.
But it is currently scheduled to be running from 25 October to 8 November 2021

From wikipedia, we can see that Hiraku is on of the list of players at the Grand Swiss.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIDE_Grand_Swiss_Tournament_2021

This both tounmentes are not in the same date.
Answer continues without answer.

NikkiLikeChikki
@royalknigh101 - before you make such factually incorrect proclamations, you should be informed. I suggest that at minimum you begin with the politics section of the Kasparov Wikipedia page.
DanielGuel

Keep the arguments going. May the best man win! trophies.png

jay_1944

You sparked a hot one here Daniel! Lol happy.png 

NikkiLikeChikki
I, for one, am thrilled that he’s decided to participate in the Grand Swiss. I am interested to see how well he performs and will withhold judgment until after we see the results.
DanielGuel
NikkiLikeChikki wrote:
I, for one, am thrilled that he’s decided to participate in the Grand Swiss. I am interested to see how well he performs and will withhold judgment until after we see the results.

 

NikkiLikeChikki
@royalknight … I do believe I said “at MINIMUM.” All of his activities are documented with citations in the footnotes. If you want to believe that it’s all fake news, then I can be of no more help.
mpaetz

     Korchnoi just worked himself up to hate whoever was across the board. Karpov came in for the largest share of his abuse because he beat him twice in world championship matches. Korchnoi was reportedly so mad at Petrosian that he tried to get other players to denounce him even after he was dead.

     Probably the source of Korchnoi's mental problems was his experience of living through the siege of Lenningrad when a child. One of the most horrific episodes in World War II (hundreds of people dropping dead in the streets from cold and hunger every day, eating weeds, feral cats and dogs and rats, soup made from wallpaper paste, cutting off chunks of corpses to fend off starvation, regular bombings and artillery barrages) it left a psychological mark on everyone who experienced it. Victor only survived because other children in his family died and he could use their ration cards as well as his own.

DiogenesDue
royalknight101 wrote:
NikkiLikeChikki wrote:
@royalknigh101 - before you make such factually incorrect proclamations, you should be informed. I suggest that at minimum you begin with the politics section of the Kasparov Wikipedia page.

wikipedia is literally unreliable considering the fact that it can be edited by anyone

You are incorrect.  Instead, all throughout previous human history, encyclopedic sources have been unreliable, because they are written by a small number of people with a shared viewpoint.  Wikipedia entries are formed by consensus, and mistaken claims will eventually get changed.

The Internet in general and Wikipedia specifically are actually killing the days of "the victor writes the history books".  You should be happy...these advances make it harder for dictators to rule the world wink.png.  

DiogenesDue
royalknight101 wrote:
btickler wrote:
royalknight101 wrote:
NikkiLikeChikki wrote:
@royalknigh101 - before you make such factually incorrect proclamations, you should be informed. I suggest that at minimum you begin with the politics section of the Kasparov Wikipedia page.

wikipedia is literally unreliable considering the fact that it can be edited by anyone

You are incorrect.  Instead, all throughout previous human history, encyclopedic sources have been unreliable, because they are written by a small number of people with a shared viewpoint.  Wikipedia entries are formed by consensus, and mistaken claims will eventually get changed.

The Internet in general and Wikipedia specifically are actually killing the days of "the victor writes the history books".  You should be happy...these advances make it harder for dictators to rule the world .  

when eventually?

It doesn't matter in the end.  Use your abilities to discern information.  Wikipedia is a good source, and much better than most.  That is because of the ability for everyone to contribute to it, not in spite of it.

If you find an entry that looks like it's suspect, do more research.  You know, like anyone has to do when they try to find out anything.

NikkiLikeChikki
Most people who yell “fake” provide no specifics as to why an individual case may be false. As I said, all sources are cited and more reliable than Internet forums. It’s easier to just make sweeping claims without evidence than to confront the evidence directly.

Multiple independent audits of Wikipedia pages over the years have shown extremely high rates of accuracy. Of course you will make the unfalsifiable claim that a cabal with its own agenda is pulling all of the strings. Why they would do so in this instance is beyond me, though.
Svetozar37769

Maybe he has the a chess version of the 'twisties'.........   

realraptor
btickler wrote:
royalknight101 wrote:
NikkiLikeChikki wrote:
@royalknigh101 - before you make such factually incorrect proclamations, you should be informed. I suggest that at minimum you begin with the politics section of the Kasparov Wikipedia page.

wikipedia is literally unreliable considering the fact that it can be edited by anyone

You are incorrect.  Instead, all throughout previous human history, encyclopedic sources have been unreliable, because they are written by a small number of people with a shared viewpoint.  Wikipedia entries are formed by consensus, and mistaken claims will eventually get changed.

The Internet in general and Wikipedia specifically are actually killing the days of "the victor writes the history books".  You should be happy...these advances make it harder for dictators to rule the world .  

 

Congratulations!

This may be the most clueless thing I've ever seen written on the net.

Wikipedia has a controlling group of left-wing editors who exclude material that they don't agree with.  

The clearest example of this is the declaration of any news site that isn't left wing as a non-reliable source(RS), but there are many others.  The RS thing means that those sites can never be included in a politically contentious article.

DiogenesDue
realraptor wrote:

Congratulations!

This may be the most clueless thing I've ever seen written on the net.

Wikipedia has a controlling group of left-wing editors who exclude material that they don't agree with.  

The clearest example of this is the declaration of any news site that isn't left wing as a non-reliable source(RS), but there are many others.  The RS thing means that those sites can never be included in a politically contentious article.

Another conspiracy nut.  Shouldn't you guys be back in hiding now?

realraptor
btickler wrote:
realraptor wrote:

Congratulations!

This may be the most clueless thing I've ever seen written on the net.

Wikipedia has a controlling group of left-wing editors who exclude material that they don't agree with.  

The clearest example of this is the declaration of any news site that isn't left wing as a non-reliable source(RS), but there are many others.  The RS thing means that those sites can never be included in a politically contentious article.

Another conspiracy nut.  Shouldn't you guys be back in hiding now?

I trust the audience to judge whose argument is stronger.

DiogenesDue
realraptor wrote:

I trust the audience to judge whose argument is stronger.

Me too.  Better luck next time.

3h61-0

According to the FIDE calendar, there are the following world events:

World Amateur Championship 2021 Rhodes, Greece 16 Oct 2021 26 Oct 2021
FIDE Chess.com Grand Swiss and Women’s Grand Swiss 2021 Riga, Latvia 25 Oct 2021 08 Nov 2021
FIDE Online Cadets & Youth Rapid Grand Prix Series Online 01 Nov 2021 24 Nov 2021
4th FIDE World Chess Championship for People with Disabilities 2021 Online 04 Nov 2021 14 Nov 2021
FIDE World Chess Championship 2021 Dubai, UAE 24 Nov 2021 16 Dec 2021
World Juniors U20 Championships 2021   2021 2021
World Youth U16 Chess Olympiad 2021 Nakhchivan, Azerbaijan 2021 2021
FIDE Online Cadets & Youth Rapid Super Final Online 18 Dec 2021 24 Dec 2021
3h61-0

There is only one classical & OTB event Naka can play in: Grand Swiss Riga

TCSPlayer
@NikkiLieChikki, If Karpov was a monarchist during USSR, he was really brave! They would have simply killed him. Also nothing bad about being monarchist. Zimbabwe 🇿🇼 is Republic with a record mass murder and Norway is monarchy, which one is more democratic? Being fan of a specific political approach doesn’t automatically make you a good person.