@sp1nnyc Nice to hear someone chime in about the analysis. I feel that learners don't really have anything to analyze.
why should i not resign?

I think of him more as a political historical figure, but we can arm wrestle over it.
The definition of historical is dead.

Died while I was still in graduate school in the twentieth century.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1994/07/he-was-a-crook/308699/
almost everyone ive spoken to about chess seems to keep telling me not to resign, sure ive seen people turn games around but almost everyone ive played with doesnt really seem to blunder after my initial mistake, am i just too bad?
If you resign your games. You have a 100% chance of losing.
If you do not resign your games. You have less then a 100% chance of losing.
The math is simple.
Or you can look at players like GM Nakamura. GM Nakamura will mostly fight to the bitter end in losing positions.
That is why GM Nakamura has the reputation of being able to save lost positions even against other GM players.
GM Nakamura is the master of the swindle!.
yeah but i see absolutely terrible players around my range sprinkled around youtube yet i just lost a game because i was one pawn down which eventually turned into a difference of around 3 pawns but still, people are simply too good around here, another weird thing that i noticed is that its slightly easier to beat 1500s on lichess than 400-500s in here

almost everyone ive spoken to about chess seems to keep telling me not to resign, sure ive seen people turn games around but almost everyone ive played with doesnt really seem to blunder after my initial mistake, am i just too bad?
No, It's a rare case. Sometimes you get stalemated, but yeah, you would still have a chance if you don't resign. There are many possibilities like, mis clicking, lost connection etc.
But we don't talk politics here. 😁