Hyperbole can make board games confusing.
Why stalemate a draw?
Sort:
Although thought to be just a work of fiction, the Alaskan Bull Worm is anything but an invented creature of imagination. Extremely uncommon, the Bull Worm first came about by special breeding of llamas and a now extinct type of worm scientifically called the Praegandis Blattarius Serpens. The Bull Worm is a result of a freak experiment conducted in a now governmentally shut down lab. It’s widely speculated that the use of nuclear technology was involved. This picture of the Alaskan Bull Worm is the only one in existence ever since they all escaped the facility into the wild. Locals around the area have reported sightings in the forest during hikes and have even said that the Bull Worms would chase them and crawl faster than a dog can run. Because of these creatures’ unstable hormone imbalance due to it’s mutant gene codes they are assumed to be highly aggressive and will attack anyone that comes across to them in a wrong way. Even though there are less than a few hundred now in existence please be very cautious if you ever happen to come across these seemingly harmless animals.
Hi chess friends, ladies and gentlemen. I am just wondering about this question? You may think that this is a kind of a joke or illogical way of my thinking. I believe that chess is like a real life "war" where there are two oppositions attacking each other's Kingdom. If you kill (or checkmate in chess) the enemy King then the war is in favor of the winning King. When stalemate happens, even though a player who has more pieces even I make some exaggeration, like for example thousands of pieces are there on the board. If stalemate happens is a draw. It's really confusing that in a real war if you have only one man standing against these thousands of enemies, then who wins? That is why there are lots of draws worldwide because of stalemate. If we change a little bit about stalemate, we may decrease drawing chances. That's all just wondering.