”the other commentators have a point as well - in classical format, Carlsen has the advantage because he worked harder on chess”
I think it is being stated a bit too often as some sort of fact that Carlsen works harder than the other top players, while the other top players are more relying on talent. My impression is rather that Carlsen simply is more talented, but that doesn’t translate to him winning every event in every format or time control. Now and then he has a bad event (often in Norway for some reason), like now when he after all won easily against Caruana. And every time that happens there will be lots of posts more or less implying that Carlsen is all prep and no talent :-)
Magnus didn't get exposed. He is a great chess player and a great 960 player. Before this Tournaments there have been a lot of not sanctioned 960 Tournaments. Hikaru was considered the best by way of his past performance, and he truly is also a great 960 player who beat Wesley earlier in this Tournament.
In last year's unofficial 960 championship Carlsen beat Nakamura. A couple if days ago, Carlsen beat Caruana.
Carlsen is a great 960 player. Wesley was awesome and earned the championship. Carlsen was not exposed. That's just a ridiculous thing to say.
Well articulated. Perhaps Carlsen was in a bad form or mood going in. However, the other commentators have a point as well - in classical format, Carlsen has the advantage because he worked harder on chess. But that's not his fault, if anything, it's his merit. Fischer Random/Chess 960 is an altogether different animal - you rely more on natural ability and less on hard work. Personally, I still prefer the Classical Chess but also acknowledge its flaws.