I think technology has helped the game if anything. Before computers, if you wanted to play chess, you had to find a physical opponent by some means. Now with computers, an opponent is only a few clicks away, making training a whole lot easier.
If everyone is getting better because of computers, how does that make people's ratings higher?
Also, I have something else to say. Computers are just machines. They don't have real brains, and can't explain why the moves they find are the best in the position. You can't effectively learn chess just because you have a computer.
Nobody is saying that computers will ruin the game of chess, but that technology is under fire for whether it is a benefit or a detriment to the soul of the game its self.
I'm pretty sure "technology" isn't in the business of "stealing souls." Personally, I'm liable to worry more about that sad subset of "humans" who'd be interested in Using technology to "steal souls," ... those soul-stealing Sons of Something-or-Other-Really-Bad! (I picture them looking like this: [<--- angry emoticon])
I think technology has helped the game if anything. Before computers, if you wanted to play chess, you had to find a physical opponent by some means. Now with computers, an opponent is only a few clicks away, making training a whole lot easier.
If everyone is getting better because of computers, how does that make people's ratings higher?
Also, I have something else to say. Computers are just machines. They don't have real brains, and can't explain why the moves they find are the best in the position. You can't effectively learn chess just because you have a computer.
Nobody is saying that computers will ruin the game of chess, but that technology is under fire for whether it is a benefit or a detriment to the soul of the game its self.