Will technology ruin the game of chess?

Sort:
creepingdeath1974
gimmewuchagot wrote:
topJKMonkey wrote:

I think technology has helped the game if anything. Before computers, if you wanted to play chess, you had to find a physical opponent by some means. Now with computers, an opponent is only a few clicks away, making training a whole lot easier.

If everyone is getting better because of computers, how does that make people's ratings higher?


Also, I have something else to say. Computers are just machines. They don't have real brains, and can't explain why the moves they find are the best in the position. You can't effectively learn chess just because you have a computer.

Nobody is saying that computers will ruin the game of chess, but that technology is under fire for whether it is a benefit or a detriment to the soul of the game its self.

motherinlaw
erikzambrano wrote:
gimmewuchagot wrote:
topJKMonkey wrote:

I think technology has helped the game if anything. Before computers, if you wanted to play chess, you had to find a physical opponent by some means. Now with computers, an opponent is only a few clicks away, making training a whole lot easier.

If everyone is getting better because of computers, how does that make people's ratings higher?


Also, I have something else to say. Computers are just machines. They don't have real brains, and can't explain why the moves they find are the best in the position. You can't effectively learn chess just because you have a computer.

Nobody is saying that computers will ruin the game of chess, but that technology is under fire for whether it is a benefit or a detriment to the soul of the game its self.

I'm pretty sure "technology" isn't in the business of "stealing souls."  Personally, I'm liable to worry more about that sad subset of "humans" who'd be interested in Using technology to "steal souls," ... those soul-stealing Sons of Something-or-Other-Really-Bad! (I picture them looking like this: Yell [<--- angry emoticon]) 

Atomic_Rift
TheGrobe wrote:

Within the next 100 years I see viable computer-brain-interfaces allowing us to have seamless access to the wealth of information (and misinformation) available on the Internet, and also technology enhanced simulated telepathy.

Just like in Doctor Who! ;)

TheGrobe

Oh? Haven't watched that since the 80s.

snowrider12

Hmm...Don't know.

snowrider12

No it will improve chess, cheaters will be caught and we will learn. :)

ChezBoy

I have to disagree. Take Boris Ivanov for example. Technological advances will only make it more easy to cheat. Anti-Cheating technology will always be one step behind the new technology.

ChezBoy

Yes, very good point.

motherinlaw

What's a "chess engine?" and how do I get one? and what kind of fuel does it run on? and if it's oil or natural gas isn't that bad for the environment?  Steam would be OK ... no, not if it used wood or coal to make the steam ... and don't get me Started on nuclear ... wait, I'll bet it's a Computer Thing! ... well, then, never mind.  I never wanted to use one anyway -- I like playing with mostly human beings.  (read the last three words either way.) :-)

Lou-for-you

Never try to explain technology to your mother in law. They run on hydrogen these days. But i will get you the latest model with 4 terra of anti matter.

motherinlaw
Lou-for-you wrote:

Never try to explain technology to your mother in law. They run on hydrogen these days. But i will get you the latest model with 4 terra of anti matter.

"Anti-Mater?" Like in "mother?"  Is that some kind of joke?!  You're "anti-mothers?!"  Shame on you.  I'm an old woman, and I demand to be treated with respect.  (If you do apologize, though, I'll forgive you.  And I'll let you pick out one piece of hard candy from the bowl on the table in the hall. Smile)

Lou-for-you

Ok sorry.

DefinitelyNotGM

Technology is ruining postal chess, it's all Houdini vs Houdini

DefinitelyNotGM
motherinlaw wrote:
Lou-for-you wrote:

Never try to explain technology to your mother in law. They run on hydrogen these days. But i will get you the latest model with 4 terra of anti matter.

"Anti-Mater?" Like in "mother?"  Is that some kind of joke?!  You're "anti-mothers?!"  Shame on you.  I'm an old woman, and I demand to be treated with respect.  (If you do apologize, though, I'll forgive you.  And I'll let you pick out one piece of hard candy from the bowl on the table in the hall. )

No. Anti-matter is the opposite of normal matter. Nothing to do with mothers.

motherinlaw
DefinitelyNotGM wrote:
motherinlaw wrote:
Lou-for-you wrote:

Never try to explain technology to your mother in law. They run on hydrogen these days. But i will get you the latest model with 4 terra of anti matter.

"Anti-Mater?" Like in "mother?"  Is that some kind of joke?!  You're "anti-mothers?!"  Shame on you.  I'm an old woman, and I demand to be treated with respect.  (If you do apologize, though, I'll forgive you.  And I'll let you pick out one piece of hard candy from the bowl on the table in the hall. )

No. Anti-matter is the opposite of normal matter. Nothing to do with mothers.

It's OK, dear, I was joking.  I know it's hard to tell sometimes.  Especially with my "jokes."  That's why I usually add smiley faces.  There should be an acronym for "Don't Worry, It's Just A Joke."  Let's start one:  "dwijaj."  There.  Pass it on to others and we can use it all the time! Wink

motherinlaw
manfredmann wrote:

i can has anti-matter soft candy motheroutlaw?

Yes.

dtrasatti

I think the biggest impact technology has made outside of chess engines and chess computer is the fact that it's enabled the game to be played constantly over the internet. It's a good/bad thing in some regards. It's turned the game more impersonal, but it's also made playing more accessible. You have to take the sweet with the sour I suppose.

ChezBoy

I suppose.

zborg

The ethics of cheaters might ruin the game.  Technology is just the medium.

Catching the cheats will always be a game of cat and mouse.

Same thing has been happening in international bridge competition for many years, which (effectively) led to the creation of "duplicate bridge," and all sort or barriers to exchanging information between players during the game.  The Italians and French were regularly implicated in cheating scandals at the World Championship level, starting in the 1950s.

Still the cheating continues.  Some people, (many people), remain ethically challenged.

No surprise there.

And it's even worse on the annonymous internet. 

ponz111

They cheated at luck bridge and this led to duplicate bridge?

It is possible to cheat at duplicate bridge also.