And what does this have to do with chess?
Women deserve to rule the world.
Sort:
wanmokewan wrote:
And what does this have to do with chess?
Nothing.
There should be more threads about vacation abuse and flagging.
A good whine once in a while keeps the doctor away. - Albert Einstein
Apr 9, 2018
0
#5
wanmokewan wrote:
And what does this have to do with chess?
it is in the off topic section, what is your problem?
Apr 9, 2018
0
#6
RedGirlZ wrote:
Men are the reason we live in a thriving society now, so I disagree with this "women have to rule the world" mentality just because we haven't done it yet.
You go, girl! HAAAAAAAAAa
RedGirlZ wrote:
Men are the reason we live in a thriving society now, so I disagree with this "women have to rule the world" mentality just because we haven't done it yet.
Men are filled with testosterone and therefore impulsive violence and aggression. As weapons become more and more powerful, it seems having women in charge is probably a MUST to avoid extinction. Perhaps it was good for us in the past to have men in charge, but as I said, weapons continue to grow exponentially in power and it only takes 1 impulsive decision by a chain of half a dozen men to wipe out millions of people instantly.. It's very scary. OR perhaps the men who ARE in charge must have testosterone-inhibiting injections. Women are the compassionate life force, the mothers, the voice of reason and love, the balance to our impulsive violent tendencies.
and redgirlz from what i see you talk and act like a misogynistic man, or a highly oppressed woman who has been raised by sexists. It's actually hard to believe you are a woman at all, your profile looks like one a man would make if he were to be posing as a woman to spit out anti-feminist hate.
This is scientifically flawed. Women are not better suited for positions of leadership. Give me a break.
Cubronzo wrote:
This is scientifically flawed. Women are not better suited for positions of leadership. Give me a break.
Well you better figure out an alternative solution, because men are scientifically PROVEN to be MORE VIOLENT. Time and time again, advances in SCIENCE, are WEAPONIZED, therefore our weapons are growing in power at an EXPONENTIAL RATE.... No I won't give you a break until the logic fails to elude you.
AntonioEsfandiari wrote:
Maybe we should tear down all of society and just live life like the Indians did. No large governments, no economy, just us sharing resources and keeping the planet healthy.
Cubronzo wrote:
This is scientifically flawed. Women are not better suited for positions of leadership. Give me a break.
Well you better figure out an alternative solution, because men are scientifically PROVEN to be MORE VIOLENT. Time and time again, advances in SCIENCE, are WEAPONIZED, therefore our weapons are growing in power at an EXPONENTIAL RATE.... No I won't give you a break until the logic fails to elude you.
I mean, that's a better solution to what you're suggesting.
Cubronzo wrote:
I mean, that's a better solution to what you're suggesting.
why are you so threatened? instead of being ridiculous why don't you explain why a world dominated by women would be so terrible for society?
Apr 9, 2018
0
#14
No one deserves something just because of there gender...unless deserving to be treated like a human being.
FishEyedFools wrote:
No one deserves something just because of there gender...unless deserving to be treated like a human being.
More important than "who deserves what," which can be debated all day based on its subjectivity, how about posing "what increases the human race's chance at evading extinction." Right now we are on a path to being extinct or nearly-extinct in the next 100-200 years (very conservative estimate, probably much lower) Currently as a whole, we are a greedy selfish society, on its way to making the earth inhabitable, depleting natural resources, creating unsolvable waste, impulsively making dangerous decisions, and right now there are enough nuclear weapons to destroy all life on earth... I think it would be much safer for the world if the chain of command behind those nukes wasn't a line of men.
AntonioEsfandiari wrote:
To run the world you have to be very intelligent and very conscientious. You also have to be very stress-resistent. When you look at a comparative mapping of male and female IQ distributions across the Bell Curve, you notice that men's IQs seem to spread out more. What this means is that men tend to be smarter (and dumber) than women, whereas women tend to be more average. It's also the case with conscientiousness, even thought women score higher on average in this personality dimension. Women are also over a standard deviation (perhaps ever two) above men on average in trait neuroticism, and are thus far more prone to stress.
Cubronzo wrote:
I mean, that's a better solution to what you're suggesting.
why are you so threatened? instead of being ridiculous why don't you explain why a world dominated by women would be so terrible for society?
https://www.ploughshares.org/world-nuclear-stockpile-report (14,000+ nuclear weapons ON FILE, modest modern estimates assume 1000+ UNACCOUNTED-for nuclear weapons as well)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Boy (This is the nuclear weapon used on hiroshima, over 70 years ago) I have been to hiroshima a dozen+ times ( I was stationed in Iwakuni, Japan) , I have seen the museum, I have seen the city. The most powerful bombs nowadays are over ONE THOUSAND TIMES MORE POWERFUL!!!!!! that means we have the power of over 14 MILLION Hiroshimas... Almost 150,000 people died in hiroshima... and we have over 14 MILLION TIMES that power (on the record) There are only 7+ billion people on the planet... We are violent impulsive emotionally-driven lunatics on a path for self-extinction.
You’re honestly an idiot
Apr 9, 2018
0
#19
AntonioEsfandiari wrote:
Cubronzo wrote:
This is scientifically flawed. Women are not better suited for positions of leadership. Give me a break.
Well you better figure out an alternative solution, because men are scientifically PROVEN to be MORE VIOLENT. Time and time again, advances in SCIENCE, are WEAPONIZED, therefore our weapons are growing in power at an EXPONENTIAL RATE.... No I won't give you a break until the logic fails to elude you.
Have you ever seen the movie, "monster"??
AntonioEsfandiari wrote:
Women have been treated as less-than-equals for thousands of years, yet they are the ones that give birth, protect our babies, and do most of the child-raising , they are the reason we haven't already gone extinct from relentless genocide. They are the nurturing, conservative, preservation-based counterparts to our aggressive impulsive violent selves. A balance of the two was needed for most of our evolution, perhaps it was best for survival for men to be in charge back then, but now, and surviving in the future with exponentially-advancing weapons, perhaps it is safer for the survival of the human race if mostly women ran the world for a while.
imagine a world with only women. Without men to manipulate, they would also be clueless and eventually would turn on each other. It’s what humans do.
Women have been treated as less-than-equals for thousands of years, yet they are the ones that give birth, protect our babies, and do most of the child-raising , they are the reason we haven't already gone extinct from relentless genocide. They are the nurturing, conservative, preservation-based counterparts to our aggressive impulsive violent selves. A balance of the two was needed for most of our evolution, perhaps it was best for survival for men to be in charge back then, but now, and surviving in the future with exponentially-advancing weapons, perhaps it is safer for the survival of the human race if mostly women ran the world for a while.