would you do this???


No, I would take the rook first with the knight, winning a whole rook for nothing.
Or do you mean in general, would I trade a queen for two rooks? It depends on the situation. I did it in a game posted here because I could see that I would win after the trade. But it's completely different in different situations.

well there are something you should notice, usualy 2 rocks for a queen its a good trade when your giving up the queen, but here the way i would analise this situation if it where one of my games.
- The knight its an active pice that i should keep.
- Taking the black knight for free and moving away my own from danger.
- The black king its some what exposed.
- due reason 3 i should look a way to atack it.
- due reason 4 i should get my best atacking pice (aka: queen) near to that king asap.
After this i would play 1.-N6xd5 and look for a way to move my queen near to that lone black king and try to mate it.
P.S: i only comenting cose i look at your games and you dont have this position on going.

Azoth wrote:
well there are something you should notice, usualy 2 rocks for a queen its a good trade when your giving up the queen, but here the way i would analise this situation if it where one of my games. After this i would play 1.-N6xd5 and look for a way to move my queen near to that lone black king and try to mate it. P.S: i only comenting cose i look at your games and you dont have this position on going.
The black king its some what exposed.due reason 3 i should look a way to atack it.due reason 4 i should get my best atacking pice (aka: queen) near to that king asap.
for the ps iw ouldnt cheat, theres no point
Would you swap a queen for 2 castles in a match
.In this situation??
Sorry guys my bad just pretend the knight isnt there until the end where he takes it