Steven-ODonoghue wrote:
Magnus definitely, I have zero respect for Naka, i'd rather play chess with a chimpanzee than with him, at least the chimp would show more manners and be a more gracious loser
Whoah took it extremely too far
Would You Rather!!! Today's Question: Check Below!!! (Ended)
Sort:
I lose either way so might as well lose to Magnus.
Steven-ODonoghue wrote:
Magnus definitely, I have zero respect for Naka, i'd rather play chess with a chimpanzee than with him, at least the chimp would show more manners and be a more gracious loser
well, why don't we show this to hikaru?
Hikaru. I would probably learn more by watching a game that goes a little longer.
Nov 10, 2020
0
#26
royalknight101 wrote:
Against hikaru 10 min would be helpful but its not like him to play rapid that much and besides i rarely see magnus play bullet on chess.com so it would be more interesting to play him than hikaru
Magnus doesn't use chess.com does he?
Hikaru
Nov 10, 2020
0
#30
A one minute game that goes 45 seconds, or a ten minute game that goes 45 seconds? Hmmmm.
Hikaru because i think he would offer at least 1 tip after the game maybe and I really want to learn more
Hikaru obvious! I'm most likely to learn more from a 10 min chess game.
Carlsen because Naka is more popular as a streamer and he plays on chess.com so the odds of playing him are bigger then Carlsen.
So Carlsen
I will go for hikaru...
i guess...
What is the difference anyway
Magnus
Victoria_the_Duck a écrit :
I will go for hikaru...
i guess...
What is the difference anyway
Hikaru is mainly a blitz player and is a more popular streamer.
Magnus is more a bit of everything and is a better player/less popular streamer
Magnus, since I have played Hikaru at least 3 times already