16985 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
@Yereslov: Yes, if you can prove your point and be "immortal" why not take the wager?
Although I am betting on Pfren!
See that is the thing, no one here except me will be straightforward with you, btw IM phren posted a pretty good line, it does indeed appear that you drop like flies after Qh5
He must not have calculated deeply enough.
It leads to a draw.
If the IM were to play this sacrifice from black's side, and if black were to play accurately, he would lose.
so what you are saying if one side make the best moves and the other makes blunders or innacuracies the one who played accuratley will win
WELL CONGRATS YOUR FIND IS AMAZING
Yes, that is if you are a god at chess. Without blunders chess would be a boring game.
Yeah, blunders are part of chess, but I'm pretty sure a 1300 will make more blunders than an IM.
And why does Yereslov get to use Rybka? If he was playing a 1500 for example, even if the 1500 gets a better starting position, there is a rating gap of about 1700 points. The real fair way is to let both players use engines.
Don't (re)feed the troll, please.
Yeah, blunders are part of chess
For Yereslov, it is the main part apparently.
I rarely ever blunder. My chess rating on ChessCube and FICS is 1750 and 1800+ respectively.
I rarely ever blunder.
You mean, except in that game, and every other you posted on chess.com forums ?
Blitz really doesn't count.
And coincidentally you play only blitz ?
I can't take online chess seriously.
Why not, it's your best bet?
Yereslov stinks on this site, but he is magical on others. Why can't we just leave it at that?
Just telling it like it is, even yereslov agrees he is refuted.
Btw, the game showcased in the OP is an immortal because yereslov is a zombie. Rising from the dead, when you think you killed him .
It is ALIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Don't english me!
by kaynight a few minutes ago
Does most of the world really love the stalemate factor?
by evertVB a few minutes ago
What do you say when people ask how good at chess you are ?
by Smokering26 2 minutes ago
Please check my game
by notmtwain 4 minutes ago
All The Reasons We Hate V3!
by Caedrel 4 minutes ago
When is the Carlsen vs Nakamura blitz final?
by notmtwain 5 minutes ago
Advice for my Chess Tournament
by ChessOfPlayer 6 minutes ago
History of obtaining points
by batgirl 7 minutes ago
8/27/2016 - Alexander Hildebrand, Springaren, 1951
by Laki_97 8 minutes ago
8/26/2016 - Kouatly - Tsheshkovsky, Hoogovens 1988
by BryanCFB 10 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!