well I was over the top I just wanted us all to enjoy each others rants....
This quote is from your site......
“If men will not act for themselves, what will they do when the benefit of their effort is for all?” Elbert Hubbard, from A Message to Garcia
This quote is from mine I see we agree with each other xxxxx.....
“No doubt another may also think for me; but it is not therefore desirable that he should do so to the exclusion of my thinking for myself” |
|
IQ 140 The ability to understand and love MsJean.
aww thankyou !
echecs, hate to break it to you buddy, but msjean's avatar is just that...an avatar..,.. Your IQ is 0. LOL LOL LOL LOL :-)
nah this test is crap i got all of them right but it can`t be that i have iq of 160....
Some sources give Garry Kasparov, a renowned chess player, an IQ between 185 and 190. But in 1987-88, the German magazine Der Spiegel went to considerable effort and expense to find out Kasparov's IQ. Under the supervision of an international team of psychologists, Kasparov was given a large battery of tests designed to measure his memory, spatial ability, and abstract reasoning. They measured his IQ as 135 and his memory as one of the very best. I think this lower number is much more realistic than all those numbers above 140. Most IQ tests stop at about IQ 140 because you just can't design a good test for higher IQs. There are just not enough people to validate the test.
The picture was great though... a burning house and the dark lord on his... terror horse
That's not the dark lord! It's the dark lord's bitch.
I'm obviously not familiar with whatever mythology nazgul is from 
The picture was great though... a burning house and the dark lord on his... terror horse
That's not the dark lord! It's the dark lord's bitch.
I'm obviously not familiar with whatever mythology nazgul is from
LORD OF THE RINGS! I guess lord of the fishies too....
Oh, heh, I saw the movie, never read the books >_>
This Thread has had 5,715 views and 262 posts since 6/6/11
This is probably a better indication of our collective intelligence than any written test.
This Thread has had 5,715 views and 262 posts since 6/6/11
This is probably a better indication of our collective intelligence than any written test.
+1
Question two is 30, 33, not 90, 93.
I'm sure you are wishing you didn't write that now, perhaps a closer look at the pattern of +3 then double..
Sorry, not trying to be smart, as I clearly am not. I scored a very average 100 IQ o; So easy when you see the answers though o;
3 is wrong. hermes is a planet, its mercury. pluto isnt a planet. the answer is pluto
Would visuals also count instead of optics? I, as a non-native speaker, consider it roughly the same.
Also I got Rio de Janeiro right for the complete wrong reasons. It was the only city with a name composed of more than 1 word... 
I got 9 of 10 correct (legitimately, no looking ahead). When I took an IQ test in school many years ago, I scored 159, which is pretty close to the 151 here. However, I would of course get utterly trounced by Garry at chess, and I don't believe in a single IQ score anyway... There are lots of forms of intelligence. It's multi-axial, not just some line from low scores to high. And if you want to get even more philosophical, "IQ" probably has no meaning at all. It's likely way more complicated than a series of numbers produced by a test, even a multi-axial test.
I'll bet u didn't notice that the first question salmon was capitalized and the others weren't. In a true iq test the questions are designed with each answer being right to some degree but with different meanings and levels of trueness
9/10. Thought it was Bombay because Delhi, not Bombay, is the capital of India. Forgot that Brasilia is the capital of Brazil.
Also, Pluto isn't a planet, but it was considered one in the 1980s.
The picture was great though... a burning house and the dark lord on his... terror horse
That's not the dark lord! It's the dark lord's bitch.