Your Rank?

Sort:
Relentless95

This is a system of rating ranks that I made up, feel free to find where you are.

2900-3000  International Grandmaster

2800-2899  Grandmaster

2600-2799  International Master

2400-2599  National Master

2300-2399  Federal Master

2200-2299  Master

2000-2199  Semi-Master

1900-1999  Minimaster

1700-1899  Logical Master

1600-1699  Pre-Mastery

1400-1599  Advanced

1200-1399  Intermediate

1000-1199  Novice

700-999      Beginner

1-699          First Timer 

orangehonda

ooh, I like the mini-master, might need a booster seat when playing, but is a tough opponent!

I'm sure I'm rated somewhere in the middle.

Goppew

767

The_Pyropractor

I am intermediate in all of my ratings

Ladytall47

First Timer here

Shivsky

The pessimist in me would rather welcome a classification based on the types of mistakes the players make. 

This would be my take on a  Federation (USCF) rating scheme:

0-800 : My mom/dad will buy me ice-cream/not beat the daylights out of me (depending on where you're from) if I sit through this tournament and not drop pieces today.

800-1200: Habitual Piece Dropper.

1200-1400: Vitamin D/Whole  "Hope Chess" player. (based on NM Dan Heisman's definition of "Hope Chess")

1400-1600: Low-Fat "Hope Chess" player, Arbitrary "I have no idea what's going on" middle-game piece trader.

1600-1800: Lazy Analyzer/"Inconsistent in quality" move-maker 

1800-2000: ??? (please fill in, I'm not here yet ...)

2000 and above: ?

Relentless95

I hope everyone likes these rankings :)

rubygabbi

I dare suggest an additional ranking for an expert at setting traps.

He should receive the title of Master Baiter.

Relentless95
rubygabbi wrote:

I dare suggest an additional ranking for an expert at setting traps.

He should receive the title of Master Baiter.


I should add that somewhere, I'll try.

Hobbes_NLC

Im intermediate but i notice that when you play in live over the board chess your rating drops 400 points. Isnt this weird?

Cystem_Phailure

Hmmm -- "pre-mastery" for me.  I don't get the benefit of the better adjectives below me, such as "advanced" or "intermediate", but I also don't get a title with the full word "master", which starts right above me.  Caught between the enlisted and the officers, I guess.  Maybe I'm like a warrant officer?

--Cystem Cool

Relentless95
Cystem_Phailure wrote:

Hmmm -- "pre-mastery" for me.  I don't get the benefit of the better adjectives below me, such as "advanced" or "intermediate", but I also don't get a title with the full word "master", which starts right above me.  Caught between the enlisted and the officers, I guess.  Maybe I'm like a warrant officer?

--Cystem 


Pre-Mastery is better than advanced or intermediate even though the adjective isn't too creative. Plus you're only 11 points away from "Logical Master." I hope you make it. Wink

orangehonda
Shivsky wrote:

The pessimist in me would rather welcome a classification based on the types of mistakes the players make. 

This would be my take on a  Federation (USCF) rating scheme:

0-800 : My mom/dad will buy me ice-cream/not beat the daylights out of me (depending on where you're from) if I sit through this tournament and not drop pieces today.

800-1200: Habitual Piece Dropper.

1200-1400: Vitamin D/Whole  "Hope Chess" player. (based on NM Dan Heisman's definition of "Hope Chess")

1400-1600: Low-Fat "Hope Chess" player, Arbitrary "I have no idea what's going on" middle-game piece trader.

1600-1800: Lazy Analyzer/"Inconsistent in quality" move-maker 

1800-2000: ??? (please fill in, I'm not here yet ...)

2000 and above: ?


@ first bolded part, lol Smile the parents will reward/punish the kid, but according to the scale even if 400 points stronger he'll drop them without meaning to I just hope he gets ice cream for his trouble Tongue out

@ second bolded part what's interesting from reading the frequent NM posters on here, they claim to be humans like us heh.  They just do the best they can too, and may not have a clue about a true evaluation / best move.  Sure they may calculate a ton of moves and spot tactics in 5 second that we don't see in 5 minutes, but compared to the very top it seems like we're all just going on a hope and a prayer, yes even titled players Smile  (Not that they're playing hope chess as defined by Heisman, I like his distinction between real/hope chess).

Fishes

New goal: Get minimaster rank and retire happily.

kyska00

You forgot 1100 half-master.

Tnk64ChessCourse

Anand is an IM, who knew?

orangehonda
thechessvids wrote:

Anand is an IM, who knew?


Current world champ only an IM?!  Hehe, I thought the same thing when reading it.

pdkmom5

    Beginner for meLaughing

Sceadungen

After my performance in a game last night that scale does not go low enough

zxb995511

I'm a N00B.