Forums

comment VANISHED

Sort:
Avatar of frrixz
frrixz
Oct 15, 2011
0
#1

How do comments just vanish--no [comment deleted] or anything?

Avatar of sftac
sftac
Oct 15, 2011
0
#2
[COMMENT DELETED]
Avatar of bobtehnoob
bobtehnoob
Oct 15, 2011
0
#3

Ehh... Whatever...

*poof*

Where did it go?

Avatar of AndyClifton
AndyClifton
Oct 15, 2011
0
#4

Avatar of frrixz
frrixz
Oct 15, 2011
0
#5
sftac wrote:

Some staff member waves a magic wand, I'll bet.

(I've had 4-8 of my posts vanish in such a fashion.  Not that they were offensive, just that the site seems to like to 'slant' topics in one direction or another.)

sftac

Even if it's entirely chess related?

Avatar of sftac
sftac
Oct 15, 2011
0
#6
[COMMENT DELETED]
Avatar of frrixz
frrixz
Oct 15, 2011
0
#7
sftac wrote:

This is a chess site.  How could anything under the sun being discussed on a chess site's forum not be entirely chess related?

sftac

LOL

hmm, let me see...

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/funny-stuff

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/movie-reviews

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/what-are-you-listening-too

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/laugh--laugh--laugh

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/word-association-by-xqsme

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/its-all-a-big-lie

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/enlightening-by-a-real-zen-master

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/fun-with-chess/an-iq-test

And the list goes on...

You were being sarcastic, right?

Avatar of sftac
sftac
Oct 16, 2011
0
#8
[COMMENT DELETED]
Avatar of frrixz
frrixz
Oct 17, 2011
0
#9
sftac wrote:

No, my point was that any thoughts by a chess player on a chess website's forum, are chess related, by definition (imo).

sftac

Your argument contains the Division Fallacy. A whole may have a certain property, but that does not imply that each piece of the whole also has that property. Just because the site has the property that it is chess-related does not imply everything on the site is.

Avatar of TheGrobe
TheGrobe
Oct 17, 2011
0
#10
frrixz wrote:

I think rather that this was sftac's point.

Avatar of TheGrobe
TheGrobe
Oct 17, 2011
0
#11
sftac wrote:

Some staff member waves a magic wand, I'll bet.

(I've had 4-8 of my posts vanish in such a fashion.  Not that they were offensive, just that the site seems to like to 'slant' topics in one direction or another.)

sftac

The moderation here may be inconsistent and erratic at times, but I seriously doubt that this was the intent.

Avatar of AndyClifton
AndyClifton
Oct 17, 2011
0
#12
frrixz wrote:

 

Your argument contains the Division Fallacy. A whole may have a certain property, but that does not imply that each piece of the whole also has that property. Just because the site has the property that it is chess-related does not imply everything on the site is.

Oh yeah, this is definitely a chess site...